Beyond LED Status Lights - Design Requirements of Privacy Notices for Body-worn Cameras

Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration

“…Similarly, Koelle et al [40] demonstrated a participatory design approach to develop devices that take into account such issues, which we believe would be useful to consider when aiming to evaluate issues of the self. The design challenges that the authors explicitly focused on were the user experience of smart cams, which bystanders do not feel comfortable with.…”

“…Furthermore, the HInt user also faces challenges as bystanders may develop mistrust and act differently or distanced. Hence, it is beneficial that the HInt technology provides transparency in its interface [40].…”

Uncovering Practical Security and Privacy Threats for Connected Glasses with Embedded Video Cameras

“…1 The key word that specifies the scope of our investigation is "connected," where the application running on the glasses needs to stream image or video data as part of its functionality, e.g., for the purpose of lifelogging [38,39], linking to social networks [53], or requiring access to specific services, such as image classification in the cloud [1,54]. We specifically focus in this work on security threats involving the wearers of connected camera glasses, such as device discovery, user tracking, unauthorized access, denial of service, video sniffing, and video hijacking; but some of these threats, such as video sniffing, may equally affect bystanders, who may be rightfully concerned about being video-recorded in public settings without their consent [23,38,39,43,48,50] with consequences about compromising their privacy and security as illustrated with Andrew's story. We discuss and demonstrate several vulnerabilities and threats with a case study involving a low-cost camera glasses device readily available to anyone.…”

“…Some of those security threats have been recently uncovered for smartwatches [81,93,94], fitness trackers [6,15,20,30], and smart armbands [103], but considerably less attention has been devoted to examine the security of video streaming camera glasses. Regarding the latter, the main focus of research has been the privacy of bystanders and their reactions to wearers of such devices [23,25,43,[48][49][50]. Regarding privacy and security, the most relevant work is Shrestha and Saxena's [80] extensive survey on the security and privacy of wearable computing that overviewed classes of wearable devices, applications, attacks, and defenses from the literature and highlighted usability, deployability, and security properties for privacy-enhancing technologies in the context of wearable computing.…”

Biometric Mirror

“…In-situ studies and experience samples are beneficial for gaining insights into the user's perspective, for example, about how the use of wearable technologies may ultimately violate the privacy of non-users [46,51,56,57,78]. However, unique challenges arise when HCI research takes place in natural contexts, where technologies and experiences are evaluated in-situ and where there is less control over the experiences and behaviors of human participants [19,22,23,72].…”