2011
DOI: 10.1177/0018720811413767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Identity: Incorporating System Reliability Information Into an Automated Combat Identification System

Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate display formats for an automated combat identification (CID) aid.Background: Verbally informing users of automation reliability improves reliance on automated CID systems. A display can provide reliability information in real time.Method: We developed and tested four visual displays that showed both target identity and system reliability information. Display type (pie, random mesh) and display proximity (integrated, separated) of identity and reliability informa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(38 reference statements)
8
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee (2012) proposed that to increase system transparency to the operator, the system's 3Ps (purpose, process, and performance), as well as the history of the 3Ps, should be visible to the operator. However, the presentation should be in a simplified form (e.g., integrated graphical displays) so the operator is not overwhelmed by the additional information he/she needs to process (Cook and Smallman, 2008;Neyedli et al, 2011;Tufte, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee (2012) proposed that to increase system transparency to the operator, the system's 3Ps (purpose, process, and performance), as well as the history of the 3Ps, should be visible to the operator. However, the presentation should be in a simplified form (e.g., integrated graphical displays) so the operator is not overwhelmed by the additional information he/she needs to process (Cook and Smallman, 2008;Neyedli et al, 2011;Tufte, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While no related studies have been identified in a driving context, knowledge can be transferred from other domains. In a military context, Neyedli et al [23] showed that integrating uncertainty information with the affected data resulted in improvements in reliance compared to a display that presented data and its uncertainty separately. Further, previous studies indicated that graphically displaying uncertainty is (at least) equally effective as numerical or verbal communication [8,31].…”
Section: Function-specific Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure users' reliance on decision aids, several studies have used signal detection theory and its measure of response bias (Meyer, 2001;Maltz & Meyer, 2001;Maltz & Shinar, 2003;Neyedli, Hollands, & Jamieson, 2011;Wang, Jamieson, & Hollands, 2009). If the aid indicates that there is a signal in a given trial, then users relying on the aid should be more liberal in responding that a signal exists than if they performed the task manually.…”
Section: Measuring Reliancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was selected based on reported effect sizes of display format on task performance (Carswell & Wickens, 1996;Neyedli et al, 2011), as well as trust and reliance (Neyedli et al, 2011). Participants received $20 for their participation in the single session.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%