2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0650-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond GDP: Conceptual Grounds of Quantification. The Case of the Index of Economic Well-Being (IEWB)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, numerous scholars have pointed out that output (GDP) and its growth as measures of economic wellbeing are flawed-not only does a measure like GDP include elements such as expenditures on crime, health care, remediation of environmental damage, etc., it also omits items such as work performed at home. Inequalities and social challenges posed by the pursuit of growth at all costs can thus obscure both limits to and drawbacks of growth (Phillips, 2006;Pissourios, 2013;Thiry, 2015). Indeed, alternative measures such as the Genuine Savings Index, the Sustainable Society Index, and the Human Development Indicator (Strezov, Evans, & Evans, 2017) have been proposed yet a single dimension measure such as GDP remains most widely used due mainly to its simplicity and narrow focus on economic growth.…”
Section: Sustainability Of the Innovation-consumption-growth Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, numerous scholars have pointed out that output (GDP) and its growth as measures of economic wellbeing are flawed-not only does a measure like GDP include elements such as expenditures on crime, health care, remediation of environmental damage, etc., it also omits items such as work performed at home. Inequalities and social challenges posed by the pursuit of growth at all costs can thus obscure both limits to and drawbacks of growth (Phillips, 2006;Pissourios, 2013;Thiry, 2015). Indeed, alternative measures such as the Genuine Savings Index, the Sustainable Society Index, and the Human Development Indicator (Strezov, Evans, & Evans, 2017) have been proposed yet a single dimension measure such as GDP remains most widely used due mainly to its simplicity and narrow focus on economic growth.…”
Section: Sustainability Of the Innovation-consumption-growth Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of economic development, the main indicators at home and abroad are adopted, including public education, employment and entrepreneurship, social insurance, medical and health services, housing security, public cultural and sports, economic aggregate, economic growth rate, economic extroversion, economic benefit, economic motive force, etc. [7][8] , the indicators are detailed in Table 1. Secondly, the data in this paper are from China Statistical Yearbook from 2000 to 2017.…”
Section: A Index Selection and Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By calculating the coordinated development index of basic public service expenditure and economic development level in 31 provinces in China from 2000 to 2016, and using the median subsection method [6][7][8] , the coordinated development index is divided into four types: 0-0. This paper takes the coordinated development index to measure the coordinated relationship between basic public service expenditure and economic development level, and to observe the changes of the relationship between the two at different stages.…”
Section: Measurement Of Coordination Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The serious work towards improving or replacing them started only around 50 years ago. After some decline of interest in such endeavours, quite many indexes of development conceived according to "beyond GDP" paradigm (Constanza et al 2009;Fleurbaey, Blanchet, 2013;Thiry, 2014) have been proposed, applied and published. The most known are Gross National Happiness (Pennock, Ura 2011, Ura et al 2012, Better Life Index (OECD 2013), Human Development Index (UNDP 2013) as well as work by a group of economists and other social scientists commissioned by French President (Stiglitz et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%