2010
DOI: 10.1080/02602930903541015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal

Abstract: Giving students detailed feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their work, with suggestions for improvement, is becoming common practice in higher education. However, for many students feedback seems to have little or no impact, despite the considerable time and effort put into its production. With a view to increasing its effectiveness, extensive theoretical and empirical research has been carried out into its structure, timing and other parameters. For students to be able to apply feedback, they nee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
555
2
73

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 810 publications
(682 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
11
555
2
73
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show how feedback requires situated use of the body and the material environment as a way of visibly displaying one's orientation and understanding. These aspects are largely overlooked in much of the transmissive understanding of feedback, criticized as mere Btelling^ (Sadler 2010(Sadler , 2013 or Bproduct^ , in which the teacher is seen as giving the student verbal information. This study provides evidence of how feedback practices are produced in multimodal interaction, showing how the student and teacher continually attend to each other and display their understanding of the assessable in the feedback with their bodies and tools, as well as the material object under production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show how feedback requires situated use of the body and the material environment as a way of visibly displaying one's orientation and understanding. These aspects are largely overlooked in much of the transmissive understanding of feedback, criticized as mere Btelling^ (Sadler 2010(Sadler , 2013 or Bproduct^ , in which the teacher is seen as giving the student verbal information. This study provides evidence of how feedback practices are produced in multimodal interaction, showing how the student and teacher continually attend to each other and display their understanding of the assessable in the feedback with their bodies and tools, as well as the material object under production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The education entails both relying on existing knowledge as well as being innovative to create something new. There is a fine line between teachers' 'tacit' expert knowing and 'the telling' in instructing (Sadler 2010). For the student, learning how to evaluate a product in progress is part of becoming a professional, with actions of planning and performing involving aesthetic as well as material properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simpson (2013) delineated its importance in modern higher education as formative assessment to enhance online learning: "Feedback drives learning" (p. 55). Paradoxically, Sadler (2010) argued that "the mere provision of feedback does not lead to improvement" (p. 536). Consequently, the complexity of feedback practice is obvious.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an environment requiring students to demonstrate cognitive skills or professional proficiency, Sadler (2010) connected feedback provisions and receptivity: "teachers who are committed to providing high-quality feedback want it to work for their students. Complementary attention should therefore be directed to what students make of the feedback" (p. 539).…”
Section: Teacher Feedback In L2 Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation