Rethinking Assessment Design: Evidence‐Informed Strategies to Boost Educational Impact in the Anatomical Sciences

Abstract

University assessment is in the midst of transformation. Assessments are no longer designed solely to determine that students can remember and regurgitate lecture content, nor in order to rank students to aid with some future selection process. Instead, assessments are expected to drive, support, and enhance learning and to contribute to student self‐assessment and development of skills and attributes for a lifetime of learning. While traditional purposes of certifying achievement and determining readiness to progress remain important, these new expectations for assessment can create tensions in assessment design, selection, and deployment. With the recognition of these tensions, three contemporary approaches to assessment in medical education are described. These approaches include careful consideration of the educational impact of assessment—before, during (test or recall enhanced learning) and after assessments; development of student (and staff) assessment literacy; and planning of cohesive systems of assessment (with a range of assessment tools) designed to assess the various competencies demanded of future graduates. These approaches purposefully straddle the cross purposes of assessment in modern health professions education. The implications of these models are explored within the context of medical education and then linked with contemporary work in the anatomical sciences in order to highlight current synergies and potential future innovations when using evidence‐informed strategies to boost the educational impact of assessments.

Assessing the Wider Outcomes of Anatomy Education

“…The growing importance for assessment to straddle both the need for the certification of achievement and determining readiness to progress, and the expectation to drive and enhance learning and provide preparation for lifelong learning is explored by Ryan and Wilkinson (2021). They describe three different approaches that include the educational impact of assessment, development of assessment literacy, and provision of systems of assessment.…”