2009
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond explanations: What else do students need to understand science?

Abstract: Students' difficulties with learning science have generally been framed in terms of their generalized conceptual knowledge of a science topic as elicited through their explanations of natural phenomena. In this paper, we empirically explore what more goes into giving a scientific account of a natural phenomenon than giving such generalized explanations. We audio-recorded pairs of upper secondary students during laboratory work in electrochemistry. We used a situative and pragmatist approach to study learning i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(59 reference statements)
2
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet there are few studies that consider how such inquiry‐based strategies transfer into other contexts; we know little about what students “take away” or appropriate (Wertsch, ) from curricula that encourage interactive practices such as discussion, collaboration, or argumentation in science education (Alozie et al., ; Ford & Forman, ; Hamza & Wickman, ). This deficiency is particularly troubling given that science learning depends upon the capacity to frame, build upon, and use knowledge in new contexts, i.e., to transfer skills and processes into new situations and new interactions (Engle, ; Lemke, ; Packer, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet there are few studies that consider how such inquiry‐based strategies transfer into other contexts; we know little about what students “take away” or appropriate (Wertsch, ) from curricula that encourage interactive practices such as discussion, collaboration, or argumentation in science education (Alozie et al., ; Ford & Forman, ; Hamza & Wickman, ). This deficiency is particularly troubling given that science learning depends upon the capacity to frame, build upon, and use knowledge in new contexts, i.e., to transfer skills and processes into new situations and new interactions (Engle, ; Lemke, ; Packer, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevernas arbete med detta hade inte sitt direkta ursprung från laborationen utan initierades ofta på grund av tillfälligheter under aktiviteten. Oförutsedda enskildheter har visats ha betydelse för vilken riktning elevers resonemang tar i laborativa sammanhang och under en laboration lär sig därför eleverna också en rad saker som inte är medvetet planerade för, till exempel mätnoggrannhet eller praktiska färdigheter (Hamza & Wickman, 2009). Ett exempel på detta från vårt material var när eleverna med hjälp av miniräknaren försökte plotta en graf.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
“…Students need to use reasoning skills to apply, analyse and synthesise concepts and knowledge (Hamza & Wickman, 2009;Schwab, 1978). A study by Utay and Calik (2016) examined the effect of student-centred learning strategies on conceptual learning in chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%