2015
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond excise taxes: a systematic review of literature on non-tax policy approaches to raising tobacco product prices

Abstract: Objective Raising the price of tobacco products is considered one of the most effective ways to reduce tobacco use. In addition to excise taxes, governments are exploring other policies to raise tobacco prices and minimise price dispersion, both within and across price tiers. We conducted a systematic review to determine how these policies are described, recommended and evaluated in the literature. Data sources We systematically searched six databases and the California… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, cigarette cartons were also available for purchase in all on-base stores, compared with only 61% of off-base community retailers. Pricing exerts a strong influence on tobacco consumption,11 and switching to discount brands30 and buying cigarettes in bulk through cartons37 38 are two strategies often employed by smokers to keep cigarettes affordable. Selling low price products even more cheaply on-base could thus contribute to tobacco relapse and initiation among Airmen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, cigarette cartons were also available for purchase in all on-base stores, compared with only 61% of off-base community retailers. Pricing exerts a strong influence on tobacco consumption,11 and switching to discount brands30 and buying cigarettes in bulk through cartons37 38 are two strategies often employed by smokers to keep cigarettes affordable. Selling low price products even more cheaply on-base could thus contribute to tobacco relapse and initiation among Airmen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, pricing policies that specifically target the low end of the pack price distribution, like minimum floor price laws similar to the one in New York City, might be more effective at reducing price variation than raising average prices through mechanisms like excise taxes. 36 If whites are often the beneficiaries of particularly cheap purchasing opportunities, as our data suggests, they may be the most impacted by minimum pricing laws. Additional research on the ways in which pricing markets are impacted by minimum price laws could be useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the lack of progress towards non-tax approaches to increasing price was surprising, especially given the well-documented relationship between tobacco prices and use, particularly among youth, as well as new evidence about the role of price promotions in targeting price-sensitive consumers 19. In addition, few states reported any policy activity to restrict retail advertising or implement health warnings, which reflects the legal challenges associated with restricting commercial speech and the chilling effects of the 2010 lawsuit against graphic health warning signs in New York City 5 13…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA) has clarified the authority that states and communities have to adopt new policies that restrict the time, place and manner of tobacco advertising and promotions 17 18. Other types of policies to regulate the retail environment for tobacco can decrease tobacco retailer density, increase tobacco product prices through non-tax approaches19 and extend laws that specifically pertain to cigarettes to all tobacco and other products, including cigars, snuff and e-cigarettes. A number of these policy priorities are not addressed by federal laws and thus are consigned to states and communities for regulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%