2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond 90% capture: Possible, but at what cost?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The net-zero paradigm entails balancing any residual CO 2 emissions with an equivalent amount of permanent CO 2 removal from the atmosphere. Because of large uncertainties in the cost of technologies such as direct air capture (DAC) (Dods et al, 2021), a recent focus in CCS development has been to achieve CO 2 capture rates well above 90% (Feron et al, 2019;Gao et al, 2019;Hirata et al, 2020;Brandl et al, 2021;Danaci et al, 2021). But regardless of the ability to achieve high capture rates, upwards of 30% of a refinery's emissions may remain unaddressed by post-combustion CCS alone.…”
Section: Why Use a Multipronged Approach?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net-zero paradigm entails balancing any residual CO 2 emissions with an equivalent amount of permanent CO 2 removal from the atmosphere. Because of large uncertainties in the cost of technologies such as direct air capture (DAC) (Dods et al, 2021), a recent focus in CCS development has been to achieve CO 2 capture rates well above 90% (Feron et al, 2019;Gao et al, 2019;Hirata et al, 2020;Brandl et al, 2021;Danaci et al, 2021). But regardless of the ability to achieve high capture rates, upwards of 30% of a refinery's emissions may remain unaddressed by post-combustion CCS alone.…”
Section: Why Use a Multipronged Approach?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 , 50 The recovery constraint of 90%, however, is rather an arbitrary choice of policy to encourage technologies that have higher success in large-scale mitigation of carbon dioxide. 48 , 51 In fact, there are compelling reasons that reducing the recovery target can be beneficial for practical reasons especially for gas streams with higher concentrations of CO 2 (e.g., carbon capture from cement plants). 48 , 52 54 In this review, we mainly focus on the DOE’s 95% purity and 90% recovery targets, considering they have been overwhelmingly used by the majority of materials screening studies conducted so far.…”
Section: Postcombustion Carbon Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic analysis shows that US $70-100 are needed to capture one tonne CO 2 from flue gas (the average CO 2 concentration is about 3-14%) on average. On the other hand, it costs between US $300 to $1,500 to capture CO 2 directly from air (Brandl et al, 2021). It would be possible to commercialize the capture efficiency beyond 90%.…”
Section: Co 2 Capture Technologies For Coal Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%