2015
DOI: 10.1080/15298868.2015.1082499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between two selves: comparing global and local predictors of speed of switching between self-aspects

Abstract: 2015): Between two selves: comparing global and local predictors of speed of switching between self-aspects, Self and Identity,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of such overlapping features raises the possibility that more than one self-concept can be allocated as the self at once, perhaps due to spreading activation of features associated with several concepts (McConnell, Rydell, & Brown, 2009). For instance, some have speculated that those with greater working memory capacity might be capable of simultaneously activating two self-concepts (Brown, Bailey, Stoll, & McConnell, 2016), yet no work has explored such exciting possibilities.…”
Section: The Case For Multiple Self-allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of such overlapping features raises the possibility that more than one self-concept can be allocated as the self at once, perhaps due to spreading activation of features associated with several concepts (McConnell, Rydell, & Brown, 2009). For instance, some have speculated that those with greater working memory capacity might be capable of simultaneously activating two self-concepts (Brown, Bailey, Stoll, & McConnell, 2016), yet no work has explored such exciting possibilities.…”
Section: The Case For Multiple Self-allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With all that said, our results cannot rule out the possibility of simultaneous selfrepresentation altogether. Future work could explore whether multiple self-allocation might be elicited depending on other factors, including (i) cultural differences in independent versus interdependent self-orientation (Geertz, 1975;Grossmann & Na, 2014); (ii) individual differences in self-complexity (Linville, 1987;Rafaeli-Mor, Gotlib, & Revelle, 1999), a composite measure of the number of selves one identifies with and the features they share in common; (iii) individual difference in relative self-importance, the relative importance one places on different self-concepts (Brown et al, 2016;Sanz-Vergel, Demerouti, Bakker, & Moreno-Jiménez, 2011); and (iv) intersectional identities, whether one typically manages multiple self-concepts that are especially salient, as is common in transgender individuals and black women (De Vries, 2012;Reid & Comas-Diaz, 1990). Future work could also try splitting the self-relevance task across the visual hemifields, given that performance on other high-level tasks such as attentive tracking improves when items are divided across the hemifields, suggesting that each brain hemisphere has separate cognitive resources to devote to the items in its corresponding hemifield (Alvarez & Cavanagh, 2005;Sperry, Gazzaniga, & Bogen, 1969).…”
Section: Self-reference Effects For Various Imagined Self-conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluid self-identity, which refers to the ability to reinterpret oneself to accommodate the immediate social environment, is a necessary precondition for social adaptability (Brown et al, 2016;Amiot et al, 2007;Wheeler et al, 2007;Markus & Kunda, 1986). For example, to understand the perspective of someone who holds different social values from one's own, we must not only take their perspective but also temporarily setting aside our own (Carr & Winkielman, 2014;De Jaegher, Di Paolo, Gallagher, 2010).…”
Section: Social Interaction Alters Neural Representations Of Self-ide...mentioning
confidence: 99%