2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between simplicity and accuracy: Effect of adding modeling details on quarter vehicle model accuracy

Abstract: Quarter vehicle model is the simplest representation of a vehicle that belongs to lumped-mass vehicle models. It is widely used in vehicle and suspension analyses, particularly those related to ride dynamics. However, as much as its common adoption, it is also commonly accepted without quantification that this model is not as accurate as many higher-degree-of-freedom models due to its simplicity and limited degrees of freedom. This study investigates the trade-off between simplicity and accuracy within the con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a lumped-mass, rigid body mathematical model that is commonly used in studies concerning fundamental suspension analyses, including inerter and semi-active suspensions [14]. While maintaining simplicity, it can be used to obtain qualitatively correct sprung and unsprung mass responses [23] for comparative analyses, and adequate accuracy are achievable without resorting to higher-DOF models [24]. For comprehensiveness, the quarter vehicle parameter values of a truck and a bus were adopted, as both these heavy vehicle classes were of interest in the study of inerter's performance benefit.…”
Section: Vehicle Modeling and Setup Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a lumped-mass, rigid body mathematical model that is commonly used in studies concerning fundamental suspension analyses, including inerter and semi-active suspensions [14]. While maintaining simplicity, it can be used to obtain qualitatively correct sprung and unsprung mass responses [23] for comparative analyses, and adequate accuracy are achievable without resorting to higher-DOF models [24]. For comprehensiveness, the quarter vehicle parameter values of a truck and a bus were adopted, as both these heavy vehicle classes were of interest in the study of inerter's performance benefit.…”
Section: Vehicle Modeling and Setup Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the value of the sprung mass ranges from 90 [39] to 476 kg [40] while the value of the unsprung mass ranges from 20 kg [3] to 80 kg [41]. Moreover, the values of the stiffness and the damping coefficients of the suspension lay in the ranges of 9000 N m [42] to 30,000 N m [43] and 980 N•s m to 4300 N•s m [44], respectively. In this study, the QC model consisted of a sprung mass m s = 270 kg connected to the unsprung mass, considered to have the value of 10% of the sprung mass, m u = 27 kg.…”
Section: Qc Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Submodelos multibody desarrollados según modelos y parámetros Quarter Car existentes en el estado del arte (Ming Foong Soong [6], Jorge Hurel [7]) y aplicados en el análisis de la dinámica vertical de vehículos.…”
Section: Bodies02-05 Submodelos Quarter Car Ruedamotor -Suspensiónunclassified