Between Firm Changes in Earnings Inequality: The Dominant Role of Industry Effects

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.We find that most of the rising between firm earnings inequality that dominates the overall increase in inequality in the U.S. is accounted for by industry effects. These industry effects stem from rising inter-industry earnings differentials and not from changing distribution of employment across industries. We also find the rising inter-industry earnings differentials are almost completely accounted for by occupation effects. These results link together the key findings from separate components of the recent literature: one focuses on firm effects and the other on occupation effects. The link via industry effects challenges conventional wisdom. JEL Classification:J3

The Declining Worker Power Hypothesis: An Explanation for the Recent Evolution of the American Economy

“…21 Kim and Sakamoto (2008) also find evidence of a decline in inter-industry wage dispersion using the CPS-ORG, albeit with a different methodology. Note that our result does not conflict with the result of Haltiwanger and Spletzer (2020), who find that the dispersion of average log earnings across industries has risen over 1997-2013: this pattern also exists in our raw CPS data, but is reversed once occupation and individual characteristics are controlled for. In addition, much of the decline in industry wage differentials we identify in the CPS occurs before 1997.…”

Dispersion in Dispersion: Measuring Establishment-Level Differences in Productivity

“…Productivity dispersion is also important for understanding rising wage inequality, which has been shown to be a between-firm phenomenon (Davis and Haltiwanger, 1991;Barth et al, 2016;Song et al, 2019;Haltiwanger and Spletzer, 2020). In addition, several studies have found that high-wage establishments are also more productive establishments and that rising between-establishment dispersion in wages is closely associated with rising betweenestablishment dispersion in productivity (e.g., Dunne et al, 2004).…”

The Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Checked Out on Up-To-Date Observations in African Countries

“…Moreover, these efforts by governments should focus especially on improving productivity and not on expanding the area devoted to agriculture. In this sense, as Haltiwanger and Spletzer (2020) point out, the development of industry will initially increase inequality, as Kuznets also argued, but it is a necessary stage in the process of achieving a modern economy in which the population enjoys a welfare state, and such development is strongly linked to access to electricity. This assertion is based on the fact that access to electricity will increase equality of opportunity for the population, positively impacting the economy as a whole as Marrero and Rodríguez (2019) argue, because a population with access to electricity will be able to develop their skills and engage in more specialised sectors.…”