The two main issues in Israel's foreign policy are relations with the Arab world and relations with the Great Powers, and there is extensive literature on both. But whereas the literature on relations with the Great Powers is marked by a broad consensus, the literature on relations with the Arab world is dominated by a deep and often acrimonious debate. A major landmark in the evolution of this debate was the emergence in the late 1980s of a school of "new," or revisionist, Israeli historians. Among the members of this group were Simha Flapan, Benny Morris, Ilan Pappe, and the present author. 1 We were called the "new historians" because we challenged the traditional Zionist narrative of the birth of Israel and of the first Arab-Israeli war. The momentous events that unfolded in 1948 were the main focus of the debate. 2 Subsequent books by some of these authors extended the critique of Israel's policy in the conflict to the post-independence period. 3 The debate between the "old" and the "new" historians has been going on for nearly two decades, and it is still going strong. By contrast, the literature on Israel's international orientation has been much less contentious and much less controversial. While differences on specific issues and episodes undoubtedly exist, there is no alternative school of thought about the shift in Israel's posture from non-alignment in 1948 to close alignment with the West by 1956. Agreement on the broad contours of the story of how Israel came to be aligned with the West should not be confused, however, with lack of progress in scholarship on the subject. On the contrary, the declassification of official documents in Israeli, Western, and Soviet archives makes it possible for scholars to write in much greater detail and depth than in the past about Israel's relations with both East and West in the first decade of statehood. 4 The purpose of this article is to review Israel's policy in world politics during this critical decade in light of some of the new evidence that is now available. One of the original imperatives of Zionist strategy in world politics was an alliance with a Great Power. External support was essential for the project of building an independent Jewish state in Palestine. From the very beginning, toward the end of the 19th century, the Zionist movement displayed two features that were to be of fundamental and enduring importance in its subsequent history: the non-recognition of a Palestinian national entity, and the quest for an alliance with a Great Power external to the Middle East. Theodor Herzl, the visionary of the Jewish state, exemplified both of these features. He assumed that the Zionist movement would achieve its goal not through an understanding with