Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2674918.2674923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Better transit routing by exploiting vehicle GPS data

Abstract: Current public transport journey planners are mostly based on timetables, i.e., their planning assumes implicitly that all transit vehicles run on schedule. Unfortunately, this is not always the case, as unpredictable delays may occur frequently and for many unplanned reasons. In this scenario, deviations from the original schedule may have quite a negative impact on the quality of the journeys provided by timetable-based planners, as they increase the probability of missed connections and thus result in longe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They provide strong evidence that computing journeys according to the published timetable often fails to deliver optimal or even high-quality solutions. However, incorporating real-time GPS location data of vehicles into the journey planning algorithm helps improve the journey quality (e. g., in terms of the experienced delay) [13,84].…”
Section: Extended Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide strong evidence that computing journeys according to the published timetable often fails to deliver optimal or even high-quality solutions. However, incorporating real-time GPS location data of vehicles into the journey planning algorithm helps improve the journey quality (e. g., in terms of the experienced delay) [13,84].…”
Section: Extended Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results extend the limited research into the potential disparity between accessibility model estimates based on the schedule and those based on real PT performance (e.g. Firmani et al, 2013;Allulli et al, 2014;Delling et al, 2014). Compared to the existing insights, which consider journey planners and do not attempt to quantify expected travel time error, this research considers deterministic and time-invariant (DTI) and stochastic and time-invariant (STI) network models in addition to a time-dependent one.…”
Section: Chapter 5 Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This provides an opportunity to substitute schedules in accessibility models with data that describes how the real system operates. To date, few models have included AVL (Firmani et al, 2013;Allulli, Italiano & Santaroni, 2014;Delling, Italiano, Pajor & Santaroni, 2014). Our understanding of how influential AVL is on an accessibility model is limited.…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Van der Hurk et al (2015) studied how to determine the realized path (i.e., the chosen route) of travelers given the entrance and exit points of a railway network, with the purpose of studying their behavior especially in disruption situations. Delling et al (2014) investigated the similar problem of integrating vehicle (position) information in the search for better route advice in transit networks.…”
Section: Passenger Guidance and Route Choicementioning
confidence: 99%