2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Betel quid without tobacco as a risk factor for oral precancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
91
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About 2.5 million people are affected by oral submucous fibrosis, mostly in Indian subcontinent (Cox et al, 1996) with an incidence of oral cancer of 7.6% for a median 10 year follow-up period. The smokeless tobacco and betal quid chewing even (with or without tobacco) increases the risk of oral pre-cancers, as reflected by the dose response relationships for both frequency and duration (Jacob et al, 2004).…”
Section: Cancer Mouthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 2.5 million people are affected by oral submucous fibrosis, mostly in Indian subcontinent (Cox et al, 1996) with an incidence of oral cancer of 7.6% for a median 10 year follow-up period. The smokeless tobacco and betal quid chewing even (with or without tobacco) increases the risk of oral pre-cancers, as reflected by the dose response relationships for both frequency and duration (Jacob et al, 2004).…”
Section: Cancer Mouthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 However, this study 12 did report unadjusted dose response data. The 5 remaining studies [7][8][9][10][11] were included in the review together with the results of our study. Table IV shows characteristics of the studies including the numbers of cases and controls and the proportion exposed to betel quid that did not contain tobacco.…”
Section: Systematic Review and Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies, 5 Adjusted for alcohol and smoking, matched for age (63 years), sex, date of diagnosis (63 months).- 6 Adjusted for education, occupation, cigarette smoking, in nonalcohol drinkers, matched for age (63 years) and gender.-7 Adjusted for age, sex, education, BMI (kg/m 2 ) pack years smoking and years of alcohol.- 8 Adjusted for age, smoking and Human Papilloma Virus.- 9 Adjusted for age sex, census division and smoking. including the present one, reported on betel quid without tobacco chewing in non-smokers, with varying control for other potential confounding factors.…”
Section: Systematic Review and Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South India chewing betel quid/ paan (betel leaf enclosing sliced areca nut, catechu, lime and various other spices which may or may not contain tobacco) (Warnakulasuriya et al, 2002;Rani et al, 2003;Aruna et al, 2011) is a common habit but the evidence for cancer occurrence due to this habit without tobacco is limited (Znaor et al, 2003;Lee et al, 2005). 'Quid' has been defined as ' a substance or mixture of substances, placed in the mouth or chewed and remaining in contact with the mucosa usually containing one or both of the two basic ingredients, tobacco and/or areca nut, in raw or any manufactured of processed form (Mehta , 1993;Jacob et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2005). Gutka is a mixture of powdered tobacco, areca nut, and slaked lime (aqueous calcium hydroxide).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other forms of smokeless tobacco products commonly used in the Indian subcontinent are khaini, zarda which are mixtures of powdered tobacco and slaked lime and mishri a powdered form of tobacco which is rubbed on the gums (Rani et al, 2003;Javed et al, 2010). According to a re-evaluation in 2004 by the International Agency for Research of Cancer both betel quid and areca nut have been considered to be Group 1 or 'carcinogenic to humans' (Jacob et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2005). In India tobacco is most commonly smoked in the form of cigarettes or bidis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%