Best Practices in Quantitative Methods 2008
DOI: 10.4135/9781412995627.d28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best Practices in the Analysis of Variance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When appropriate, comparisons among treatment groups, delays and cue conditions and among treatment groups at each time point were performed using contrast tests. Because mixed-model analysis holds even with missing data as long as the missing data occur completely at random, no imputation/deletion was applied (Overall and Tonidandel, 2007;Howell, 2008); data were missing for only one subject (E group) at one time point (9 months) due to an acute illness. Differences were considered statistically significant at p Ͻ 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When appropriate, comparisons among treatment groups, delays and cue conditions and among treatment groups at each time point were performed using contrast tests. Because mixed-model analysis holds even with missing data as long as the missing data occur completely at random, no imputation/deletion was applied (Overall and Tonidandel, 2007;Howell, 2008); data were missing for only one subject (E group) at one time point (9 months) due to an acute illness. Differences were considered statistically significant at p Ͻ 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a Results of a repeated measures analysis of variance: Differences between types of training needs for all types of counselors combined were statistically significant with a small effect, F (8.48, 7719.77) = 16.45, p < .004, η 2 = .02 b For all but the descriptive statistics variable, this is univariate F (df within , df between ) = (2, 863). For the descriptive statistics variable, the homogeneity of variance assumption was violated, so Welch's F (2, 268.72) was used as per Howell (). c Tukey post hoc comparisons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the second research question, one-way ANOVA was used to test the null hypothesis that there was no performance difference among the customized underwires with different lengths. Scheffe's post hoc tests were followed for further analysis, together with power analysis, and a .05 significance level of confidence was adopted for hypothesis testing (Howell, 2008). SPSS Statistics 24 and GPower 3.1 software packages were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%