2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12678-017-0378-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best Practices and Testing Protocols for Benchmarking ORR Activities of Fuel Cell Electrocatalysts Using Rotating Disk Electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
114
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
5
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent and accurate measurements of metrics (onset potential, overpotential, half‐wave potential, limiting current density, and exchange current density) through good electrochemical practice is vital when vastly different catalysts are being compared and new materials are emerging at such a fast rate. Many guides to best practice in using rotating disk electrode (RDE) or rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE) to evaluate catalysts exist, though their advice is not always followed in the literature as evidenced by recent articles on common pitfalls in electrochemical catalyst evaluation . Considering the impact of catalyst loading on the amount of peroxide intermediate seen in RRDE experiments, it is recommended that evaluation of all new catalysts should be made with loading ranges from 40 to 800 µg cm −2 before any conclusions about the four‐electron pathway are made .…”
Section: Best Practice For Oxygen and Hydrogen Electrocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent and accurate measurements of metrics (onset potential, overpotential, half‐wave potential, limiting current density, and exchange current density) through good electrochemical practice is vital when vastly different catalysts are being compared and new materials are emerging at such a fast rate. Many guides to best practice in using rotating disk electrode (RDE) or rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE) to evaluate catalysts exist, though their advice is not always followed in the literature as evidenced by recent articles on common pitfalls in electrochemical catalyst evaluation . Considering the impact of catalyst loading on the amount of peroxide intermediate seen in RRDE experiments, it is recommended that evaluation of all new catalysts should be made with loading ranges from 40 to 800 µg cm −2 before any conclusions about the four‐electron pathway are made .…”
Section: Best Practice For Oxygen and Hydrogen Electrocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the reported SA values are mean values calculated at least from 3-4 independent and statistically significant ORR measurements. At this respect, it is important to recall that the ORR activity and reproducibility are strongly affected by a number of experimental parameters [64,65] that control the catalyst film thickness and uniformity (film quality). The lack of control of these experimental parameters is the origin of inaccurate, irreproducible and unreliable ORR measurements [64,65].…”
Section: Oxygen Reduction In 01 M Hclo4 and 01 M Koh Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catalytic inks were fabricated for the Pt 2 NiCo/C and Pt/C (Pt/C Etek ® 20 wt.%) catalysts according to a previously reported protocol [43] and deposited on a glassy carbon disk electrode (0.196 cm 2 ) with Pt loadings of 20 ± 2 µg Pt cm geo −2 . Electrochemical experiments were performed at room temperature (25 ± 2 • C) in a three-electrode electrochemical cell using a 0.1 M HClO 4 solution as electrolyte.…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%