‘Best practice’ community dialogue: The promise of a small-scale deliberative engagement around the siting of a carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) facility

Coyle, Fiona

doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.006

Cited by 15 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Research has drawn on varied theoretical concepts including social licence to operate [22,41], media representations (e.g., [42,43]), and justice and human rights (e.g., [44]). There has been a strong emphasis on risk and risk communication; L'Orange Siego et al [26] highlight the importance of mental models and knowledge to draft risk communication material, and the importance of benefit perceptions and trust, the importance of stakeholder engagement and experience of other technologies, findings echoed by many [4,19,31,36,45,46].…”

Section: Methods and Theoretical Contextsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The potential for public acceptance of CCS and the factors which impact upon it have been explored using a variety of methods, depending on the theoretical framework underpinning the research. For example, qualitative methods including focus groups [31] support an in-depth understanding of alternative viewpoints and the reasons behind different responses, whereas surveys (e.g., [12,19]) provide a more superficial analysis from an extensive sample of people. In a recent study, Bellamy et al [25] used a mixed methods approach, presenting alternative policy scenarios to different groups and assessing perceptions of BECCS using a limited survey and group discussions to understand the differences between the groups.…”

Section: Methods and Theoretical Contextsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Whilst research into BECCS is in its infancy and there is limited deployment of the technology, research into CCS highlights the influence of geographical context on the social responses. CCS studies have explored responses in countries where there are already operational CCS projects e.g., Canada [26] and Norway [27], where there is policy interest in CCS e.g., the UK [18,22,[28][29][30], the wider Nordic region [21], and New Zealand [31], and where there has been opposition to CCS projects e.g., The Netherlands [32] and Germany [9,19,33,34]. These studies emphasise the importance of understanding the specific social context for deployment as a dynamic interaction of people, places, and events which drive public perceptions.…”

Section: Geographical Contexts and Place-based Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Beyond Social Acceptability: Applying Lessons from CCS Social Science to Support Deployment of BECCS

Gough¹,

Mander²

2019

Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review This paper assesses social science research relating to BECCS and considers the applicability of research on CCS to BECCS. Recent Findings In recent years, social science research on CCS and BECCS has gone beyond an evaluation of public acceptance to provide a more nuanced analysis of the wider social political, ethical, and governance contexts in which large-scale deployment might be achieved. This raises issues at global, local, and regional scales, requiring a wide array of methods and approaches. Summary Awareness of the scale and urgency needed to act on climate change is growing and the role of BECCS in delivering carbon dioxide removal forms a central argument for the use of this family of technologies. Here, framing becomes a critical factor in how society responds to BECCS technologies and we argue that making the case for BECCS as a means of extending mitigation to make a 'net zero' goal achievable could be the key to its acceptable and sustainable deployment. Keywords CCS. BECCS. Carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Negative emissions. Social responses. Acceptability This article is part of the Topical Collection on Deep Decarbonization: BECCS

show abstract

Section: Methods and Theoretical Contextsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methods and Theoretical Contextsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Geographical Contexts and Place-based Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Beyond Social Acceptability: Applying Lessons from CCS Social Science to Support Deployment of BECCS

Gough¹,

Mander²

2019

Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Model ini mencoba mengintegrasikan dua paradigma komunikasi pembangunan, yakni model difusi dan partisipatif yang kadang dianggap saling bertolak belakang satu dengan lainnya. Model ini juga berupaya menerjemahkan filosofi partisipasi ke dalam sebuah proses yang efektif memotivasi komunitas untuk bertindak kolektif dan memungkinkan mereka memonitor perkembangan dan meningkatkan kapasitasnya sendiri (Figueroa et al, 2002) Penerapan community dialogue menarik pemerintah dan masyarakat ke dalam proses yang terbuka dan transparan, mendengarkan secara aktif, terjadi dialog konsultatif, memberdayakan masyarakat dalam mengedukasi diri sendiri, membangun pemahaman informasi dengan sudut pandang berbeda serta meningkatkan partisipasi termasuk dalam pengambilan keputusan (Coyle, 2015). Community dialogue mampu memberikan dampak perubahan sikap yang signifikan dibanding penggunaan pesan media massa konvensional (Egeonu dan Nwachukwu, 2013).…”

Section: Imcfsc Menggambarkan Proses Community Dialogue Dan Collectiveunclassified

Dialog dan Tindakan Kolektif Kelompok Tani dalam Program Sertifikasi Kakao di Provinsi Sulawesi Barat

Asia

Sarwoprasodjo

Gandasari³

2019

Jurnal KMP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The cocoa certification program is the implementation of cocoa management practices that meet sustainable agricultural standards. This program is part of the commitment of cocoa sector stakeholders to realize sustainable cocoa. West Sulawesi Province is one of cocoa production centers in Indonesia. The implementation of cocoa certification in this province is still low, about 8.4% of the total cocoa farmers. This study aims to determine the potential for sustainability of the adoption of Cocoa Certification from development communication aspect by conducting an assessment on dialogue and collective action of farmer groups. The research conducted in Luyo Sub-District Polewali Mandar District West Sulawesi Province using survey method with descriptive correlation analysis. The sample size is 41 groups with 205 respondents. Descriptive analysis shows the average index of the implementation of community dialogue and collective action of 56.05,50,88 and 65.72 from a maximum score of 100. The results indicated that perception of farmers on the observability of Cocoa Certification and the role of facilitators are significant related to dialogue and collective action of farmer groups. The dialogue in the group is significant correlated with their collective action. So, some farmer groups have potential to continue to adopt the Cocoa Certification standard but others have potential to quit.

show abstract

“…Impartial education, to ensure informed opinion, combined with ongoing engagement are crucial to societal acceptance. 43…”

Section: Mitigation Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing potential interactions of subsurface resources

Fielding

Barton

Funnell

et al. 2017

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Subsurface resources include oil, gas, coal, groundwater, saline aquifer minerals, and heat (for geothermal use). Pore space itself should also be considered as a resource as it can be used for injection of waste fluids, produced water, storage of natural gas, compressed air, and supercritical CO 2. Use of subsurface resources can overlap in space, and pressure changes at one site can remotely influence resource use at other sites. Resource use can also vary in time, such as the use of depleted oil or gas fields for natural gas or CO 2 storage. Before allocation of a subsurface resource it is therefore useful to understand the potentially wide range of resources available in an area, how they might be developed successively, and how they could affect each other if used concurrently. While these issues are primarily geological, they have critical significance for legal, environmental, and economic considerations.

show abstract

‘Best practice’ community dialogue: The promise of a small-scale deliberative engagement around the siting of a carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) facility

Cited by 15 publications

References 50 publications

Beyond Social Acceptability: Applying Lessons from CCS Social Science to Support Deployment of BECCS

Beyond Social Acceptability: Applying Lessons from CCS Social Science to Support Deployment of BECCS

Dialog dan Tindakan Kolektif Kelompok Tani dalam Program Sertifikasi Kakao di Provinsi Sulawesi Barat

Managing potential interactions of subsurface resources

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About