2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2005.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benthic biotope index for classifying habitats in the sado estuary: Portugal

Abstract: An integration of sediment physical, chemical, biological, and toxicity data is necessary for a meaningful interpretation of the complex sediment conditions in the marine environment. Assessment of benthic community is a vital component for that interpretation, yet their evaluation is complex and requires a large expenditure of time and funds. Thus, there is a need for new tools that are less expensive and more understandable for managers. This paper presents a benthic biotope index to predict from physical an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential of adverse effects on the biota is classified by SQG-Q-in this case, either metals (SQG-QM) or pesticides (SQG-QP). Field station code correspondence between this study and the one performed by Caeiro et al [11] is R ϭ S116, S1 ϭ S40, S2 ϭ S43, S3 ϭ S102, and S4 ϭ S157.…”
Section: Location and Brief Characterization Of Field Stationssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The potential of adverse effects on the biota is classified by SQG-Q-in this case, either metals (SQG-QM) or pesticides (SQG-QP). Field station code correspondence between this study and the one performed by Caeiro et al [11] is R ϭ S116, S1 ϭ S40, S2 ϭ S43, S3 ϭ S102, and S4 ϭ S157.…”
Section: Location and Brief Characterization Of Field Stationssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The locations of field stations in the Sado River estuary are presented in Figure 1. The characteristics of these field stations were described exhaustively by Caeiro et al [11] with the use of samples collected during summer 2003. Here (Table 1), we present a summary of this characterization, which is based on sediment organic load, hydrodynamics, benthic biotope index (BI bio ) [12], sediment quality guideline quotient (SQG‐Q) [13] for metals and pesticides, amphipod ( Gammarus locusta ) mortality tests with whole sediments [14], and sea urchin ( Paracentrotus lividus ) embryo abnormality bioassay with sediments [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach has been widely used to develop macrobenthos distribution maps linking habitat suitability models, based on biological data from points in different datasets and accompanying physical data (Shin, 1982;Guisan & Zimmermann, 2000;Vanaverbeke et al, 2002;Caeiro et al, 2005;Degraer, 2008). Discriminant function analysis (DFA) is the validated statistical approach applied in these cases where the response variable is a categorical entity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the index in each management area were calculated using the median values of the locations belonging to each management area (Caeiro et al 2005b). The benthos communities were classified in: 1 to 1.4-Marine; 1.5 to 2.4-Transition; 2.5 to 3.4-Estuarine; 3.5 to 4.4-Estuarine enriched; 4.5 to 5-Estuarine impoverished.…”
Section: Sediment Benthos Structurementioning
confidence: 99%