Abstract:Composite quantum chemical methods W1X‐1 and CBS‐QB3 are used to calculate the gas phase standard enthalpy of formation, entropy, and heat capacity of 38 phosphines and phosphine oxides for which reliable experimental thermochemical information is limited or simply nonexistent. For alkyl phosphines and phosphine oxides, the W1X‐1, and CBS‐QB3 results are mutually consistent and in excellent agreement with available G3X values and empirical data. In the case of aryl‐substituted species, different computational … Show more
“…Consequently, systematic differences between W1X-1 and CBS-QB3 can be attributed to inadequate treatment of electron correlation effects in the latter that become more prominent with increasing molecular size. This is in stark contrast to our previous study on phosphines and phosphine oxides, 31 in which case W1X-1 and CBS-QB3 showed much more uniform performance, albeit for a more limited set of compounds with less variety in the employed substituents. W1X-1 enthalpies are, therefore, considered superior to CBS-QB3 results and used exclusively in the remaining parts of the analysis and discussion.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…While this convention has been adopted by some authors, including Benson in his later works, 15 we chose to report group pair contributions following the practice adopted in our previous work. 31 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this convention has been adopted by some authors, including Benson in his later works, 15 we chose to report group pair contributions following the practice adopted in our previous work. 31 As discussed earlier, Becerra and Walsh have derived group contributions for silicon-based Benson groups and used them extensively in their work. Comparison of our W1X-1 data in Table 3 respectively).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following our previous work, the composite method W1X-1 was used for the calculation of standard gas-phase enthalpies of formation (Δ f H 298K ° , kJ mol –1 ), entropies ( S 298K ° , J K –1 mol –1 ), and heat capacities ( C p , J K –1 mol –1 ) for 159 organosilicon compounds (Chart ), which include 42 monosilanes ( 1 – 42 , group I ), 7 polysilanes ( 43 – 49 , groups II – V ), 31 silanols and alkoxysilanes ( 50 – 80 , groups VI – IX ), 70 acylic siloxanes ( 81 – 150 , groups X – XII ), 8 cyclic siloxanes ( 151 – 158 , groups XIII and XIV ), and 1 silylamine ( 159 , group XV ) with alkyl (Me = methyl, Et = ethyl, i Pr = isopropyl, s Bu = sec -butyl, and 3-Pe = 3-pentyl), alkenyl (Vi = vinyl), aryl (Ph = phenyl), and/or fluorine substituents. The size of the investigated systems was limited by the computational cost of the W1X-1 method that became prohibitive for molecules with more than ca.…”
A high-level composite
quantum chemical method, W1X-1, is used
herein to calculate the gas-phase standard enthalpy of formation,
entropy, and heat capacity of 159 organosilicon compounds. The results
set a new benchmark in the field that allows, for the first time,
an in-depth assessment of existing experimental data on standard enthalpies
of formation, enabling the identification of important trends and
possible outliers. The calculated thermochemical data are used to
determine Benson group additivity contributions for 60 Benson groups
and group pairs involving silicon. These values allow fast and accurate
estimation of thermochemical parameters of organosilicon compounds
of varying complexity, and the data acquired are used to assess the
reliability of experimental work of Voronkov et al. that has been
repeatedly criticized by Becerra and Walsh. Recent results from other
computational investigations in the field are also carefully discussed
through the prism of reported advancements.
“…Consequently, systematic differences between W1X-1 and CBS-QB3 can be attributed to inadequate treatment of electron correlation effects in the latter that become more prominent with increasing molecular size. This is in stark contrast to our previous study on phosphines and phosphine oxides, 31 in which case W1X-1 and CBS-QB3 showed much more uniform performance, albeit for a more limited set of compounds with less variety in the employed substituents. W1X-1 enthalpies are, therefore, considered superior to CBS-QB3 results and used exclusively in the remaining parts of the analysis and discussion.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…While this convention has been adopted by some authors, including Benson in his later works, 15 we chose to report group pair contributions following the practice adopted in our previous work. 31 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this convention has been adopted by some authors, including Benson in his later works, 15 we chose to report group pair contributions following the practice adopted in our previous work. 31 As discussed earlier, Becerra and Walsh have derived group contributions for silicon-based Benson groups and used them extensively in their work. Comparison of our W1X-1 data in Table 3 respectively).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following our previous work, the composite method W1X-1 was used for the calculation of standard gas-phase enthalpies of formation (Δ f H 298K ° , kJ mol –1 ), entropies ( S 298K ° , J K –1 mol –1 ), and heat capacities ( C p , J K –1 mol –1 ) for 159 organosilicon compounds (Chart ), which include 42 monosilanes ( 1 – 42 , group I ), 7 polysilanes ( 43 – 49 , groups II – V ), 31 silanols and alkoxysilanes ( 50 – 80 , groups VI – IX ), 70 acylic siloxanes ( 81 – 150 , groups X – XII ), 8 cyclic siloxanes ( 151 – 158 , groups XIII and XIV ), and 1 silylamine ( 159 , group XV ) with alkyl (Me = methyl, Et = ethyl, i Pr = isopropyl, s Bu = sec -butyl, and 3-Pe = 3-pentyl), alkenyl (Vi = vinyl), aryl (Ph = phenyl), and/or fluorine substituents. The size of the investigated systems was limited by the computational cost of the W1X-1 method that became prohibitive for molecules with more than ca.…”
A high-level composite
quantum chemical method, W1X-1, is used
herein to calculate the gas-phase standard enthalpy of formation,
entropy, and heat capacity of 159 organosilicon compounds. The results
set a new benchmark in the field that allows, for the first time,
an in-depth assessment of existing experimental data on standard enthalpies
of formation, enabling the identification of important trends and
possible outliers. The calculated thermochemical data are used to
determine Benson group additivity contributions for 60 Benson groups
and group pairs involving silicon. These values allow fast and accurate
estimation of thermochemical parameters of organosilicon compounds
of varying complexity, and the data acquired are used to assess the
reliability of experimental work of Voronkov et al. that has been
repeatedly criticized by Becerra and Walsh. Recent results from other
computational investigations in the field are also carefully discussed
through the prism of reported advancements.
“…In some instances, such as with organosilicon compounds, 31 inconsistencies in the reference data have completely prevented the determination of an internally consistent set of group contributions by experimental means. As shown by us 32,33 and by others, 103107 a simple fix to the problem is offered by theoretical approaches and high-level composite methods in particular. In the following, we follow this avenue and determine Benson group contributions for boron using the highlevel W1X-1 data in Table 1.…”
Section: Comparison Of Calculated Gas Phase Standard Enthalpies Of Fo...mentioning
High-level computational data for standard gas phase enthalpies of formation, entropies, and heat capacities are reported for 116 compounds of boron. A comparison of the results with extant experimental and...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.