A study of the strong N−X⋅⋅⋅−O−N+ (X=I, Br) halogen bonding interactions reports 2×27 donor×acceptor complexes of N‐halosaccharins and pyridine N‐oxides (PyNO). DFT calculations were used to investigate the X⋅⋅⋅O halogen bond (XB) interaction energies in 54 complexes. A simplified computationally fast electrostatic model was developed for predicting the X⋅⋅⋅O XBs. The XB interaction energies vary from −47.5 to −120.3 kJ mol−1; the strongest N−I⋅⋅⋅−O−N+ XBs approaching those of 3‐center‐4‐electron [N−I−N]+ halogen‐bonded systems (ca. 160 kJ mol−1). 1H NMR association constants (KXB) determined in CDCl3 and [D6]acetone vary from 2.0×100 to >108 m−1 and correlate well with the calculated donor×acceptor complexation enthalpies found between −38.4 and −77.5 kJ mol−1. In X‐ray crystal structures, the N‐iodosaccharin‐PyNO complexes manifest short interaction ratios (RXB) between 0.65–0.67 for the N−I⋅⋅⋅−O−N+ halogen bond.

Pushing the limits of coordination chemistry: The most weakly coordinated silver complexes of the very weakly coordinating solvents dichloromethane and liquid sulfur dioxide were prepared. Special techniques at low temperatures and the use of weakly coordinating anions allowed structural characterization of [Ag(OSO)][Al{OC(CF(3))(3)}(4)], [Ag(OSO)(2/2)][SbF(6)], and [Ag(Cl(2)CH(2))(2)][SbF(6)] (see figure). An investigation of the bonding shows that these complexes are mainly stabilized by electrostatic monopole-dipole interactions.The synthetically useful solvent-free silver(I) salt Ag[Al(pftb)(4)] (pftb=--OC(CF(3))(3)) was prepared by metathesis reaction of Li[Al(pftb)(4)] with Ag[SbF(6)] in liquid SO(2). The solvated complexes [Ag(OSO)][Al(pftb)(4)], [Ag(OSO)(2/2)][SbF(6)], and [Ag(CH(2)Cl(2))(2)][SbF(6)] were prepared and isolated by special techniques at low temperatures and structurally characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The SO(2) complexes provide the first examples of coordination of the very weak Lewis base SO(2) to silver(I). The SO(2) molecule in [Ag(OSO)][Al(pftb)(4)] is eta(1)-O coordinated to Ag(+), while the SO(2) ligands in [Ag(OSO)(2/2)][SbF(6)] bridge two Ag(+) ions in an eta(2)-O,O' (trans,trans) manner. [Ag(CH(2)Cl(2))(2)][SbF(6)] contains [Ag(CH(2)Cl(2))(2)](+) ions linked through [SbF(6)](-) ions to give a polymeric structure. The solid-state silver(I) ion affinities (SIA) of SO(2) and CH(2)Cl(2), based on bond lengths and corresponding valence units in the corresponding complexes and tensimetric titrations of Ag[Al(pftb)(4)] and Ag[SbF(6)] with SO(2) vapor, show that SO(2) is a weaker ligand to Ag(+) than the commonly used weakly coordinating solvent CH(2)Cl(2) and indicated that binding strength of SO(2) to silver(I) in the silver(I) salts increases with increasing size of the corresponding counteranion ([Al(pftb)(4)](-)>[SbF(6)](-)). The experimental findings are in good agreement with theoretical gas-phase ligand-binding energies of [Ag(L)(n)](+) (L=SO(2), CH(2)Cl(2); n=1, 2) and solid-state enthalpies obtained from Born-Fajans-Haber cycles by using the volume-based thermodynamics (VBT) approach. Bonding analysis (VB, NBO, MO) of [Ag(L)(n)](+) suggests that these complexes are almost completely stabilized by electrostatic interaction, that is, monopole-dipole interaction, with almost no covalent contribution by electron donation from the ligand orbitals into the vacant 5s orbital of Ag(+). All experimental findings and theoretical considerations demonstrate that SO(2) is less covalently bound to Ag(+) than CH(2)Cl(2) and support the thesis that SO(2) is a polar but non-coordinating solvent towards Ag(+).

Keywords: Bond theory / Lewis bases / Coordination compounds / O ligands / Lithium / Silver / Silicon / Siloxanes 1,3-Dimethyldisiloxane, O(SiH 2 Me) 2 , diethyl ether, OEt 2 , and their metal complexes (Li + ,Ag + ) have been used as model systems to uncover the reasons underlying the lower Lewis basicity of siloxanes compared to analogous ethers. Bonding in the metal complexes has been analyzed with quantum theory of atoms in molecules as well as natural bond orbital theory. The binding to Li + by O(SiH 2 Me) 2 and OEt 2 is largely of monopole -dipole type whereas binding of Ag + also shows small charge transfer components. The more ionic Si-O bonds in O(SiH 2 Me) 2 compared to C-O bonds in OEt 2 lead to more negative charge on the oxygen atom of O(SiH 2 Me) 2 but the electrostatic attraction between metal cations and OEt 2 is calculated to be slightly stronger by interacting quantum atoms energy decomposition analysis. The lower electrostatic attraction by O(SiH 2 Me) 2 is due to repulsion between [a]

The recombinant allergens can be used reliably to identify Can f 1 and Can f 2-sensitized individuals. However, the two allergens are insufficient as reagents for diagnosing dog allergy.

It's the crown that does it: The auto‐ionization of [TiF4] has been promoted by complexation with [15]crown‐5 to produce [TiF2([15]crown‐5)][Ti4F18], which contains the new tetrahedral ion [Ti4F18]2− (see picture). The thermodynamics of the [Ti4F18]2− ion relative to the [Ti2F9]− ion in the gas, solution, and solid states were calculated by density functional methods.