2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benign superior vena cava syndrome: Stenting is now the first line of treatment

Abstract: OSR of benign SVC syndrome is effective, with durable long-term relief from symptoms. EVR is less invasive but equally effective in the mid-term, albeit at the cost of multiple secondary interventions, and is an appropriate primary treatment for benign SVC syndrome. OSR remains an excellent choice for patients who are not suitable for EVR or in whom the EVR fails.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
171
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
171
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, SVC involvement is still more common. 10,11 In this case of MF, we were able to improve the quality of life of our patient and prolong his survival after diagnosing and treating 2 high-grade stenoses-without the need for open surgery. Improvements in stent technology and in our understanding of the disease process are enabling us to lengthen survival and improve quality of life for patients with advanced MF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, SVC involvement is still more common. 10,11 In this case of MF, we were able to improve the quality of life of our patient and prolong his survival after diagnosing and treating 2 high-grade stenoses-without the need for open surgery. Improvements in stent technology and in our understanding of the disease process are enabling us to lengthen survival and improve quality of life for patients with advanced MF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…2 Benign etiologies have classically been reported to have an incidence of up to 22%, but now comprise up to 40% of cases. 3,4 Although thrombus formation is a relatively common complication of indwelling central venous catheters and pacemakers, 5,6 the development of symptomatic SVC syndrome is rare, with a reported incidence of 0.03 to 0.04%. 7,8 Superior vena cava syndrome caused by thrombus with a superimposed fungal infection is also rare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…once the gold standard diagnostic study, venography is now reserved for defining the anatomy preoperatively and for confirming vessel patency postoperatively in patients with SVC obstruction. 4 Thrombosis of the SVC can be treated conserva- tively with anticoagulation, or with thrombolysis, percutaneous angioplasty (with or without stenting), or surgery. [15][16][17] Although anticoagulation was initially attempted in this patient, the development of symptoms of SVC obstruction, the septic nature of the thrombus, and the development of embolic complications prompted the surgical treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance of long-term assisted patency required multiple reinterventions during the 36-month period. 29,30 SVC stenting for malignancy disease carries an excellent technical success rate of 95% to 100% and primary and secondary patency rates of 85% and 93%, respectively, at 3 months. 31 Clinical relief of symptoms is usually almost immediate within hours to days after successful SVC recanalization.…”
Section: Superior Vena Cava Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%