Benefits of indoor plants on attention capacity in an office setting

Raanaas, Ruth Kjærsti; Evensen, Katinka H.; Rich, Debra; Sjøstrøm, Gunn; Patil, Grete Grindal

doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.005

Cited by 208 publications

(144 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

128

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Evidences that support the positive impact of nature on people's physiological well-being are not scarce (Kellert 2012) and scientifically tested (Ryan et al 2014). Examples include improved mental health (Tyrväinen et al 2014;Ulrich 1979), reduced stress (Berman, Jonides, and Kaplan 2008;Matsunaga et al 2011), increased well-being (Ikei et al 2014;Ulrich et al 1991), attention restoration (Kaplan 1995;Raanaas et al 2011) and faster healing rates (Park and Mattson 2008;Ulrich 1984).Providing a window with a view to a pleasing nature scene or indoor planning allows the eye to adjust and re-focus, which reduces fatigue, headaches resulting in better health, less frustration, and better overall performance in work places (Kaplan 1992; Van and Bergs 2001). In the healthcare sector, a recent substantial report found that providing patients with views of nature could save the U.S. healthcare authorities up to $93 million/year (Browning 2012).…”

Section: Review Of Studies Mitigating Sbsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sick building syndrome: are we doing enough?

AlWaer

Omrany

Ghaffarianhoseini

et al. 2018

Architectural Science Review

172

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Health and well-being are vitally important aspects of people centric building design and are the roots of productivity. Sick building syndrome (SBS) is a collection of factors that can negatively affect physical health in several ways. Besides physical health is also related to psychological well-being because the human body is one interactive biological system. This paper focuses on reviewing the current state of knowledge on building sickness syndrome which has been prevalent as a building illness since the 1970s especially in offices and schools. While the concepts of intelligent, smart and sustainable buildings have gained considerable attention during recent decades, there is now increasing attention being given to designing healthy buildings. This study provides a review about SBS symptoms. Several negative effects of SBS are identified and potential solutions are advocated. Finally, the study stresses the role of built environment and concludes that ongoing research towards tackling SBS and developing healthy indoor environments should not be limited to a single formula as any health-related building design approach is dependent on several interacting factors. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

Section: Review Of Studies Mitigating Sbsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sick building syndrome: are we doing enough?

AlWaer

Omrany

Ghaffarianhoseini

et al. 2018

Architectural Science Review

172

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These biophilic design choices also boost the activity of the parasympathetic nervous system, thereby decreasing stress levels and encouraging a general sense of well-being. By promoting staff 's health, biophilic design helps to reduce sick leave, while improving satisfaction and attention levels (Browning et al 2012;Heerwagen 2000;Raanaas et al 2011;Ikei et al 2014;Nieuwenhuis et al 2014).…”

Section: Benefits Of Biophilic Design In Hospital Settingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying the benefits of biophilic theory to hospital design

Totaforti

2018

City Territ Archit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:In 1839, the Lexicon Medicum mentioned the "healing powers of nature", arguing that many illnesses could be cured without the help of medicines, simply by paying attention to air, food, rest, physical activity, and state of mind. Therefore, already then, the environment was considered therapeutic and capable of affecting the health of individuals and helping their recovery (Hickman in Therapeutic landscape. A history of English hospital gardens since 1800, 2013). This awareness has remained valid since then, although the approach has changed and evolved over time.Case description: In the 20th century, these assumptions have been supported, among others, by the research carried out by Ulrich on the ability of surgical patients to recover when they were exposed to the sight of nature. Indeed, there is a growing body of research which confirms the benefits of interacting with nature in hospital settings. The results of such studies have helped to better define a new approach to design that benefits the psychophysical wellbeing of individuals and improves their health (i.e. biophilic design). Discussion and evaluation:The aim of this article is to highlight the growing importance of a cultural change in the design of spaces aimed at reconnecting individuals with the patterns and processes of nature, both in the urban context and, in particular, in healthcare spaces. This study intends to contribute to the ongoing debate concerning a new architectural language for hospitals and to shed light on the key features of health-inducing buildings. Conclusions:The global health challenges of the 21st century require a new way of thinking and a change in the organisation of healthcare services through an approach that considers human needs in their entirety, and not in a strictly therapeutic sense. According to several studies, the humanisation of healthcare spaces and contact with nature can empower the patient and have a positive impact by reducing stress and pain and improving emotional wellbeing. However, further studies are required not just in order to deepen our understanding of the human-nature relationship and its impact on health, but also to change our approach regarding patients' health by considering a new vision of medicine, healthcare and healing environment.

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, it has been established that the additive effects of a peaceful natural environment and physical activity contribute to better mental health [35]. Experiments show that indoor plants can improve concentration and productivity, and lead to direct benefits for mental functioning [36,37]. In particular, the benefits of indoor plants are often overlooked in green building actions.…”

Section: Health Benefitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterisation of Nature-Based Solutions for the Built Environment

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nature has provided humankind with food, fuel, and shelter throughout evolutionary history. However, in contemporary cities, many natural landscapes have become degraded and replaced with impermeable hard surfaces (e.g., roads, paving, car parks and buildings). The reversal of this trend is dynamic, complex and still in its infancy. There are many facets of urban greening initiatives involving multiple benefits, sensitivities and limitations. The aim of this paper is to develop a characterisation method of nature based solutions for designing and retrofitting in the built environment, and to facilitate knowledge transfer between disciplines and for design optimisation. Based on a review of the literature across disciplines, key characteristics could be organised into four groups: policy and community initiatives, multiple benefits assessment, topology, and design options. Challenges and opportunities for developing a characterisation framework to improve the use of nature based solutions in the built environment are discussed.

show abstract

Benefits of indoor plants on attention capacity in an office setting

Cited by 208 publications

References 40 publications

Sick building syndrome: are we doing enough?

Sick building syndrome: are we doing enough?

Applying the benefits of biophilic theory to hospital design

Characterisation of Nature-Based Solutions for the Built Environment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About