2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits and Risks of High-Intensity Interval Training in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
50
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Benefits appear consistent, regardless of which HIIT protocol is adopted (i. e. 4 × 4 min or 10 × 1 min models) [81]. Historically, there has been a reluctance to deviate from conservative CR exercise in-tensity guidelines, but large datasets now confirm the safety of HIIT [82,83] and, importantly, patient acceptability [81]. However, two pragmatic multi-centre trials (SAINTEX-CAD [84] and SMARTEX-CHF [85]) did not report the superiority of HIIT using the 4 × 4 model in CHD and CHF.…”
Section: Frequencymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Benefits appear consistent, regardless of which HIIT protocol is adopted (i. e. 4 × 4 min or 10 × 1 min models) [81]. Historically, there has been a reluctance to deviate from conservative CR exercise in-tensity guidelines, but large datasets now confirm the safety of HIIT [82,83] and, importantly, patient acceptability [81]. However, two pragmatic multi-centre trials (SAINTEX-CAD [84] and SMARTEX-CHF [85]) did not report the superiority of HIIT using the 4 × 4 model in CHD and CHF.…”
Section: Frequencymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Short bouts (1-4 min) of higher intensity ( > 85 % VO 2 peak ) exercise interspersed with low intensity recovery allow patients to accumulate a greater overall 'dose' of exercise. Benefits appear consistent, regardless of which HIIT protocol is adopted (i. e. 4 × 4 min or 10 × 1 min models) [81]. Historically, there has been a reluctance to deviate from conservative CR exercise in-tensity guidelines, but large datasets now confirm the safety of HIIT [82,83] and, importantly, patient acceptability [81].…”
Section: Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HR was recorded after the first and last HI and LO intervals at each session. Participants were also encouraged to attain a Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) (6-20 scale) [25] of [15][16][17] ("hard to very hard") during the HI and 11-13 ("light to somewhat hard") during the LO intervals. Patients were instructed to record a typical RPE representing the effort of all the HI and LO intervals during HIIT.…”
Section: High-intensity Interval Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIIT is an appropriate exercise paradigm for CR settings; current American, Canadian and European CR guidelines [12] recommend the prescription and progression of moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous aerobic exercise. Despite evidence that suggests HIIT is safe for adults with CVD [14,15], concerns remain regarding the feasibility of HIIT in CR [16]. This can be examined by assessing the attendance, compliance, and experience of patients and monitoring adverse events (safety) to determine if such programs are appropriate for 'real world' settings [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Também não se observa lesões no TIAI quando aplicado em pacientes cardiopatas (Wisløff et al, 2007;Moholdt et al, 2009). Para essa população, o método TIAI permite maior tolerância ao esforço, maior aderência à prática e necessita de supervisão adequada (Warburton et al, 2005;Normandin et al, 2013;Quindry et al, 2019).…”
Section: O Papel Do Exercício Físico Na Saúde Cardiometabólicaunclassified