This article explores the association between state-level child welfare expenditures and state-level foster care outcomes (placements, lengths of stay, and reentries). Spending for each state was differentiated among federal, state, and local levels, using data from 2006 across all 50 states in the United States plus Washington, DC. The analysis found that expenditures did not consistently correspond to outcomes. For spending to be effective in helping achieve child welfare goals, agencies must apply cost analysis to their programs to explore how funding investments relate to outcomes in real-world settings.
FINANCE AND FOSTER CAREAccording to data collected by the National Incidence Study during 2005 and 2006, more than 1.25 million children experience maltreatment annually (Sedlak et al., 2010). Moreover, the study found that more than 3 million children were either harmed or were in danger of being harmed during that period, which corresponds to approximately one child in every 25 in the United States (Sedlak et al., 2010). Similarly, the Administration for Children and Families reported that in fiscal year 2010, an estimated 3.3 million referrals involving the alleged maltreatment of approximately 5.9 million children were received by child protection service agencies (U.S. Department of Health and