2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Syst 2018
DOI: 10.1109/eeeic.2018.8494441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking of Performance Requirements between IEC 61850 and DNP3 in Real-Time Monitoring Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNP3 was designed for SCADA communication [58] and can be used for power-grid automation [59]; however, it is not considered to be sufficiently flexible to handle all conceivable scenarios within the smart grid and, in particular, subsecond device controls [60]. However, DNP3 was found to be a much more resilient protocol to packet rendering, data corruption, jitter, and bandwith limitations than IEC 61850 [61]. A CPT that focuses on providing situational awareness and human-in-the-loop studies might more strongly consider DNP3, which supports a wide range of timing protocols.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNP3 was designed for SCADA communication [58] and can be used for power-grid automation [59]; however, it is not considered to be sufficiently flexible to handle all conceivable scenarios within the smart grid and, in particular, subsecond device controls [60]. However, DNP3 was found to be a much more resilient protocol to packet rendering, data corruption, jitter, and bandwith limitations than IEC 61850 [61]. A CPT that focuses on providing situational awareness and human-in-the-loop studies might more strongly consider DNP3, which supports a wide range of timing protocols.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%