Bem estar subjetivo: um estudo comparativo entre crianças dotadas e
                        talentosas e crianças não dotadas

França-Freitas, Maria Luiza Pontes de; Prette, Almir Del; Prette, Zilda Aparecida Pereira Del

doi:10.5935/2176-3038.20190022

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They do not differ in any of the used tools. These results support research that points out that the students with high abilities differentiate in cognitive aspects, which is obvious, but not in their personal and social adjustment (Borges et al, 2011), neither in their emotional reaction (Valadez et al, 2015;Egeland, 2019;França-Freitas et al, 2019).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…Some authors report that these children can show feelings like anxiety and depression due to their high sensibility (Silverman, 1993;Wellisch and Brown, 2012;Karpinsky et al, 2018;Armstrong et al, 2019). However, others point to the opposite, indicating that they have a good socio-emotional fit (Valadez et al, 2015;Egeland, 2019;França-Freitas et al, 2019). Meanwhile, Borges et al (2011) say that cognitive abilities can be used to solve any problems, allowing them a similar adjustment to their fellow partners.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Emotions and Reactions to the Confinement by COVID-19 of Children and Adolescents With High Abilities and Community Samples: A Mixed Methods Research Study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of this research is to know and compare the emotions and reactions to confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic in children and adolescents with high abilities and community samples. This is a mixed study with an exploratory reach that is descriptive, and which combines survey and qualitative methodologies to examine the emotions and reactions to confinement experiences of children and adolescents aged between 5 and 14 years. An online poll was designed with 46 questions, grouped into three sections: (1) General Data, (2) Reactions to the health contingencies of COVID-19, and (3) Positive and negative emotions. This last section was included the Oros’ positive emotions questionnaire (2014) and the scales of the negative effect of the PANAS Schedule positive and negative affect on children and adolescents between 8 and 14 years old (Sandin, 2003). Data were collected online with a convenience sample. Quantitative data were analyzed with the SPSS statistics program and qualitative data with Alceste software. Among the main findings is the fact that there are no significant differences between the groups by ability in terms of reactions and emotions; however, there are differences between age groups and sex. The study discusses the implications for educational intervention in situations like the current pandemic.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Emotions and Reactions to the Confinement by COVID-19 of Children and Adolescents With High Abilities and Community Samples: A Mixed Methods Research Study

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Psychoeducational Variables Involved in the Health Emergency

2022

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

About FrontiersFrontiers is more than just an open-access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals. Frontiers Journal SeriesThe Frontiers Journal Series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of open-access, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers Journal Series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to QualityEach Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world's best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public -and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation.

show abstract

“…Stereotypes regarding lesser personal adjustment (Preckel et al, 2015;Baudson and Preckel, 2016;Matheis et al, 2017) have been shown to be false (Reis and Renzulli, 2004;Borges et al, 2011;Bacal, 2015;Valadez et al, 2015;Egeland, 2019;França-Freitas et al, 2019), or those relating to their satisfaction with life (Bergold et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physical Activity and Well-Being of High Ability Students and Community Samples During the COVID-19 Health Alert

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The health alert caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown have caused significant changes in people’s lives. Therefore, it has been essential to study the quality of life, especially in vulnerable populations, including children and adolescents. In this work, the psychological well-being, distribution of tasks and routines, as well as the physical activity done by children and adolescents from two samples: community and high abilities, have been analyzed. The methodology used was Mixed Method Research, through a survey conducted online through social networks. The informants were the parents of the children and adolescents, 209 in the community sample and 116 in the high ability sample. The instrument used was a questionnaire implemented through Google Forms, with open and closed questions, including the Kidscreen-27 scale to measure well-being. The assessment of the adequacy of the physical activity levels was analyzed through ALCESTE. The results showed the absence of differences between students from community samples and those with high capacities in well-being and physical activity. Parents residing in Spain observed less play time in the high ability sample, and more time spent on homework, whether or not they have a diagnosis of high ability. It is concluded that these results question the misconceptions held about high ability students in terms of poorer personal adjustment and better interest in physical activities.

show abstract

Bem estar subjetivo: um estudo comparativo entre crianças dotadas e talentosas e crianças não dotadas

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Emotions and Reactions to the Confinement by COVID-19 of Children and Adolescents With High Abilities and Community Samples: A Mixed Methods Research Study

Emotions and Reactions to the Confinement by COVID-19 of Children and Adolescents With High Abilities and Community Samples: A Mixed Methods Research Study

Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Psychoeducational Variables Involved in the Health Emergency

Physical Activity and Well-Being of High Ability Students and Community Samples During the COVID-19 Health Alert

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About