2017
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belowground Attributes on Reclaimed Surface Mine Lands over a 40‐year Chronosequence

Abstract: Reclamation following mining activities often aims to restore stable soils that support productive and diverse native plant communities. The soil re‐spread process increases soil compaction, which may alter soil water, plant composition, rooting depths, and soil organic matter. This may have a direct impact on vegetation establishment and species recruitment. Seasonal wet/dry and freeze/thaw patterns are thought to alleviate soil compaction over time. However, this has not been formally evaluated on reclaimed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, passively managed natural succession was not entirely negative. Overall, invasive species prevalence did not increase over time at the reclaimed sites in CVNP, in contrast to other studies finding abundant invasive plants where natural succession had been used as a mine reclamation tool (Bohrer et al, 2017; Cavender et al, 2014). Since native species are becoming more prevalent over time and community composition appears to be changing in a chronological fashion, we suggest that succession has been slowed rather than completely arrested and that native plants are establishing later at these sites.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, passively managed natural succession was not entirely negative. Overall, invasive species prevalence did not increase over time at the reclaimed sites in CVNP, in contrast to other studies finding abundant invasive plants where natural succession had been used as a mine reclamation tool (Bohrer et al, 2017; Cavender et al, 2014). Since native species are becoming more prevalent over time and community composition appears to be changing in a chronological fashion, we suggest that succession has been slowed rather than completely arrested and that native plants are establishing later at these sites.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Exotics that pose ecological or economic threats are considered invasive species (Alpert, Bone, & Holzapfel, 2000), and often thrive in open areas and disturbed soil conditions such as those commonly present in reclaimed mines (D'Antonio & Meyerson, 2002). Thus, invasive species are often the most abundant species on reclaimed surface mines (Bohrer et al, 2017; Fields‐Johnson et al, 2012). Colonization by invasive species usually results in a decline in species richness and evenness (Hejda, Pyšek, & Jarošík, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soil and plant data among a chronosequence of 19 post-mine reclaimed sites (over a 40-year reclamation gradient), and an intact native reference site were evaluated. It was noticed that root biomass in the upper horizons (at 30 cm depth) was greater on the reference site compared with the reclaimed sites as well as the Reclamation of Soils Degraded by Surface Coal Mining DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93432 organic matter content, ranging from 3•5 to 5•4% on the reclaimed sites (not different across the reclamation chronosequence) and from 5•1 to 6•8% on the reference site [21]. On the other hand, in the Midwestern USA, there was the development of horizons in minesoils in a relatively short period of time (10-15 years), in which the 0.00-0.03 m layer consisted of non-decomposed or partially decomposed organic matter, while the 0.03-0.10 m layer was darker, with visible addition of organic carbon, and the 0.10-0.25 m layer was the least colored with interspersed roots [22].…”
Section: Reclamation Of Minesoils and Revegetation In The Usamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This use of groundcover commonly decreases water infiltration (Clark and Zipper 2016;Bohrer et al 2017) and prevents the establishment of plant species with deep root systems that can reduce soil compaction (Angel et al 2006;Martin 2006). Soil compaction has the potential to decrease the available nutrients and water that plants can uptake, depending on the soil grain sizes present (Arvidsson 1999).…”
Section: Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (Smcra)mentioning
confidence: 99%