2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-03155-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belief Functions on MV-Algebras of Fuzzy Sets: An Overview

Abstract: Belief functions are the measure theoretical objects Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is based on. They are in fact totally monotone capacities, and can be regarded as a special class of measures of uncertainty used to model an agent's degrees of belief in the occurrence of a set of events by taking into account different bodies of evidence that support those beliefs. In this chapter we present two main approaches to extending belief functions on Boolean algebras of events to MV-algebras of events, modelled as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out in [17] (see also [13,14]), since ρ 0 does not coincide in general with the zeroconstant function 0, Bel(0) cannot be ensured to equal 0. We call normalised each belief function Bel on [0, 1] W satisfying Bel(0) = 0.…”
Section: Proposition 26 ([14]mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As pointed out in [17] (see also [13,14]), since ρ 0 does not coincide in general with the zeroconstant function 0, Bel(0) cannot be ensured to equal 0. We call normalised each belief function Bel on [0, 1] W satisfying Bel(0) = 0.…”
Section: Proposition 26 ([14]mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, finitely-additive probability measures on MV-algebras are known as states and have also been studied by numerous authors, following the seminal paper by Mundici [12]. An overview of related literature can be found in Flaminio, Godo and Kroupa [9]. One may hope that ultimately an algebraic framework for aggregation theory which does encompass probabilistic opinion pooling may be developed, even though the concept of homomorphy on which our approach was based is not suitable for this purpose.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%