2017
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belgian flood risk governance: explaining the dynamics within a fragmented governance arrangement

Abstract: Despite some inertia, flood risk governance in Belgium has been fairly dynamic between 1995 and 2015. In this paper, change and stability during this period are described and explained in the four dimensions of the Policy Arrangement Approach: actors, discourses, rules, and resources. The analysis is based on 72 semi‐structured stakeholder interviews and legal document analysis. Belgian flood risk governance is characterised by a high level of fragmentation. Our analysis found that this can form a barrier to c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, these three countries show flood-related policies and strategies across national and local levels, for example, Egypt's National Strategy for Adaptation to Climate Change and DRM 2011, and Nigeria's National Erosion and Flood Control Policy 2011 and National Policy on Climate Change and Response Strategy 2013 (Osumgborogwu & Chibo, 2017). Belgium, in turn, is an example of a federal government system, where the governance and responsibility for FRM sit within the three distinct regions of Brussels, Flanders and Wallonia, and not with the federal government (Mees et al, 2016(Mees et al, , 2018. This means that, while there is no national law on flood or climate adaptation in Belgium, flood risk governance is organized through many regional regulations for flood and coastal risk management in these three regions (Castanheira et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, these three countries show flood-related policies and strategies across national and local levels, for example, Egypt's National Strategy for Adaptation to Climate Change and DRM 2011, and Nigeria's National Erosion and Flood Control Policy 2011 and National Policy on Climate Change and Response Strategy 2013 (Osumgborogwu & Chibo, 2017). Belgium, in turn, is an example of a federal government system, where the governance and responsibility for FRM sit within the three distinct regions of Brussels, Flanders and Wallonia, and not with the federal government (Mees et al, 2016(Mees et al, , 2018. This means that, while there is no national law on flood or climate adaptation in Belgium, flood risk governance is organized through many regional regulations for flood and coastal risk management in these three regions (Castanheira et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples are the water assessment and the flood information in real estate transactions in the region of Flanders [7]. The water assessment requires advice from the water manager on the impact of a permit, plan or program on the water system [42]. At the same time, the "duty to inform" instrument requires the dissemination of information regarding the vulnerability to flooding in every real estate transaction [82].…”
Section: Case Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to strengthen the role of the Flemish government, the region of Flanders has undergone reforms in the last decade to increase the capacities of the region in water management and spatial planning. The 2014 reform allowed municipalities to transfer competencies for their watercourses to the provinces [42]. These reforms have helped to decrease fragmentation in water management and spatial planning [42].…”
Section: Case Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations