1974
DOI: 10.1002/fedr.19740850402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beiträge zur Taxonomie der Gattung Calendula II. Taxonomische Revision der südeuropäischen perennierenden Calendula‐Sippen

Abstract: Die südeuropäischen perennierenden Taxa der Gattung Calendula wurden einer taxonomischen Revision unterzogen. Nach einer Übersicht über die Erforschungsgeschichte folgen Beschreibungen morphologischer und cytologischer Merkmale, die in der Hauptsache an kultivierten Pflanzen analysiert wurden. Von den Wuchsformenmerkmalen sind die verschiedenen Längen der Hauptsproßzonen, die Anzahl der Seitenzweig‐Generationen pro Vegetationsperiode, das postflorale Verhalten der reproduktiven Zweigzonen, die Längenverhältnis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nora et al (2013) discuss different hypotheses to explain the chromosome number and the genome size in C. officinalis. Both hypotheses, chromosome losses in C. maroccana (Heyn and Joel, 1983) or hybridization between C. stellata (2n = 14) and a species with 2n = 18 (e.g., C. maroccana, C. eckerleinii) followed by chromosome doubling (Ohle, 1974) are not well supported when the genome sizes of these species are taken into account. Other techniques like genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) using probes of the possible ancestors could be used to explore what species are involved in the genetic background in C. officinalis as well as to examine the loss of specific chromosomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nora et al (2013) discuss different hypotheses to explain the chromosome number and the genome size in C. officinalis. Both hypotheses, chromosome losses in C. maroccana (Heyn and Joel, 1983) or hybridization between C. stellata (2n = 14) and a species with 2n = 18 (e.g., C. maroccana, C. eckerleinii) followed by chromosome doubling (Ohle, 1974) are not well supported when the genome sizes of these species are taken into account. Other techniques like genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) using probes of the possible ancestors could be used to explore what species are involved in the genetic background in C. officinalis as well as to examine the loss of specific chromosomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( ¼ C. stellata Cav. ), was demonstrated by Lanza (1919) in ex situ experiments; hybridization in wild populations, although suspected to occur (Ohle 1974;Troia 2011), has never been verified. Here, our two lines of evidence (palynological and molecular), obtained separately but with a common goal, using different plants collected from one common and several disparate populations of the taxa of interest, are brought to bear on the question of whether hybridization between C. maritima and Cs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Some disagreement exists about the taxonomic status of C. maritima in various treatments of Calendula (e.g., C. incana subsp. maritima in Ohle 1974;C. suffruticosa subsp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compounds that showed higher positive correlations with PC 2 were, in a descending order of importance, αamyrin (30), untriacontane (42), lanosterol (29), 13-hexyloxacyclotridec-10-en-2one (3), phytol (23), phytyl palmitate (8), campesterol (33) and triacontane (41), and higher negative loadings, in an ascending order of importance, for nine compounds β-amyrin (28), neophytadiene (12), 8,14cedranoxide (17), 1H-3a,7-methanoazulen-6-ol (15), 1ethyl-4,4-dimethylcyclohex-2-en-1-ol (9), 1(2H)-naphthalenone (10), myristic acid (1), 1,3-benzenediol (38) and γ-eudesmol (21)) (Table S4). PC 3 presented seven compounds reaching positive loadings greater than 0.6, which were di-epi-1,10-cubenol (19), germanicol (25), humulane-1,6-dien-3-ol (18), THMA (13), lignoceric acid (7), α-bisabolol (11) and 1-tetracosanol (36), and six compounds showed a negative loading below À 0.6, which were HETU (24), (+)-β-guaiene (14), HMTU (26), selina-6-en-4-ol (16), MDN (20) and 2,6,6,9,2',6',6',9'-Octamethyl- [8,8']bi-[tricyclo[5.4.0.0 (2,9) ]undecyl] (OBTU, 27) (Table S4).…”
Section: Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%