1955
DOI: 10.1159/000302702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beiträge zu den Augenhintergrundsveränderungen bei Sclerosis multiplex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If parallel pathological processes develop in the retina and in the brain in clinical MS it Seems reasonable to suppose that PR occurs more frequently during the active stages of MS. A Possible correlation between PR and neurological disease activity has been suggested by Haarr (2) and since then by other authors (17,18), but none of them defined the state of neurological disease activity. Bamford (19) supported the hypothesis with a study of 14 patients with PR of whom eight were in a P~OgreSSiVe group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If parallel pathological processes develop in the retina and in the brain in clinical MS it Seems reasonable to suppose that PR occurs more frequently during the active stages of MS. A Possible correlation between PR and neurological disease activity has been suggested by Haarr (2) and since then by other authors (17,18), but none of them defined the state of neurological disease activity. Bamford (19) supported the hypothesis with a study of 14 patients with PR of whom eight were in a P~OgreSSiVe group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Bamford et al [4] reported a significant associa tion between perivenous sheathing and severe progres sion of neurological disability. A relationship with MS activity has been suggested by Orban [19] and then by others based on clinical series [20,21] or pathological studies [9]. The small number of patients, or the lack of a clear definition of neurological status and disease phase limit the possibility of drawing final conclusions on this subject.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%