1926
DOI: 10.1007/bf02919297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beitrag zur Anatomie und Klinik der reinen Worttaubheit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

1946
1946
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The exceptions are the cases of Liepmann and Storch29 and of Schuster and Taterka 15. In the latter, there was total inability to compre¬ hend the spoken word, with exception¬ ally good preservation of all the other language functions, along with a severe but incomplete loss of compre¬ hension of nonverbal sounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The exceptions are the cases of Liepmann and Storch29 and of Schuster and Taterka 15. In the latter, there was total inability to compre¬ hend the spoken word, with exception¬ ally good preservation of all the other language functions, along with a severe but incomplete loss of compre¬ hension of nonverbal sounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a subject with massive, left-lateralized damage to primary and associative acoustic cortices and Wernicke's area but spared transcallosal fibers, cortical damage was considered as the more likely cause of PWD (Slevc et al, 2011). Cases whose lesions are consistent with disconnection as defined earlier do exist, but are extremely rare (Liepmann & Storch, 1902;Schuster & Taterka, 1926;Takahashi et al, 1992). Furthermore, these latter reports do not provide data showing functional disconnection.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A few years later, Liepmann published the first autopsy report of a patient in whom a left temporal hemorrhage interrupted both the left acoustic radiation and transcallosal connections from the right hemisphere (Liepman, 1898;Liepmann & Storch, 1902). In support of the disconnection mechanism, Goldstein (1974) reviewed seven cases with unilateral lesions at autopsy, originally described by van Gehuchten & Goris (1901); Liepmann (1912) -a subject initially seen by Wernicke; Pötzl (1919); Henschen (1920); Schuster & Taterka (1926);Henneberg (1926); Kleist (1934). The disconnection hypothesis was maintained also by Geschwind (1965) This account has been implicitly accepted in most unilateral cases.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beispielsweise waren häufig bei Patienten mit zentraler Hörstörung phonematische Paraphasien zu beobachten, unter Umständen bis hin zum Jargon [124,132]. Bei einzelnen Patienten scheint allerdings die "innere Sprache" von Anfang an unbeeinträchtigt gewesen zu sein [115,173,209].…”
Section: Auditives Sprachverständnisunclassified
“…Demgegenüber vermutete Lennmalm (zitiert in [50]) auf der Grundlage klinischer Arbeiten eine Schädigung des dominanten Gyrus temporalis superior. Nur wenige pathologisch-anatomische Studien konnten eine umschriebene und weitgehend subkortikal gelegene linkshemisphärische Läsion bei verbaler oder nonverbaler auditiver Agnosie feststellen (Fall Gorstelle [115,116], Fall Hendschel [117,200], [71,72,173]). Einige weitere Kasuistiken berichteten zwar auch einen auf die dominante Hemisphäre begrenzten relevanten Herd, der aber die Rinde miteinbezogen hatte bzw.…”
Section: Reine Worttaubheitunclassified