2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.172060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural elements and sensory cues involved in sexual isolation betweenDrosophila melanogasterstrains

Abstract: Sensory cues exchanged during courtship are crucial for mate choice: if they show intraspecific divergence, this may cause or reinforce sexual isolation between strains, ultimately leading to speciation. There is a strong asymmetric sexual isolation between Drosophila melanogaster females from Zimbabwe (Z) and males from all other populations (M). While M and Z flies of both sexes show different cuticular pheromones, this variation is only partly responsible for the intraspecific isolation effect. Male acousti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Courtship of Drosophila melanogaster Meigen is one of the best studied behavioural repertoires and is multimodal and complex (Grillet, Ferveur, & Everaerts, ; Pavlou & Goodwin, ). The courtship repertoire within the genus Drosophila Fallén is more variable than is widely appreciated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Courtship of Drosophila melanogaster Meigen is one of the best studied behavioural repertoires and is multimodal and complex (Grillet, Ferveur, & Everaerts, ; Pavlou & Goodwin, ). The courtship repertoire within the genus Drosophila Fallén is more variable than is widely appreciated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this, we believe that the origin of assortative mating between Z-and M-type females is linked to their divergent perception and/or integration of male cues. Indeed, while Z females only respond to a precise and complete multisensory set of signal provided by homotypic males (GRILLET et al 2012;GRILLET et al 2018), M-type females only need part of these cues to be sexually receptive (COLEGRAVE et al 2000;GRILLET 2009;MA et al 2010;GRILLET et al 2012;GRILLET et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the experimental variation of the male tricosene ratio (7T/5T) only partly affects mating preference in Z females (GRILLET et al 2012). This suggests that the asymmetrical sexual isolation between Z and M populations involves female perception of other male-non acoustic-sensory cues (COLEGRAVE et al 2000;GRILLET et al 2012;GRILLET et al 2018).The hypothesis of sexual isolation based on multiple sensory signals and/or systems is somewhat supported by the finding that the divergence of mating preference between Z and M populations depend on a highly polygenic control (HOLLOCHER et al 1997;TING et al 2001; KAUER AND SCHLÖTTERER 2004). Also, among several genes showing matingdependent variation of expression, desat2 is up-regulated in Z flies, but down-regulated in M flies, after mating (MICHALAK et al 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the experimental variation of the male tricosene ratio (7T/5T) only partly affects mating preference in Z females (Grillet et al 2012). This suggests that the asymmetrical sexual isolation between Z and M populations involves female perception of other male—non acoustic—sensory cues (Colegrave et al 2000; Grillet et al 2012; Grillet et al 2018). The hypothesis of sexual isolation based on multiple sensory signals and/or systems is somewhat supported by the finding that the divergence of mating preference between Z and M populations depends on a highly polygenic control (Hollocher et al 1997; Ting et al 2001; Kauer and Schlötterer 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%