Genes coding for the glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and Theta 1 (GSTT1) proteins are polymorphic in humans and these genes are absent, or homozygous null, in 10-60% of different ethnic populations. These enzymes catalyze the conjugation of glutathione to numerous carcinogenic chemicals and previous epidemiologic studies have associated the null genotypes of these GST genes with higher risk of cancer. In this study the frequency of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes was determined in Japanese patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and colorectal adenocarcinoma and compared to frequencies determined in a community-based control group. The frequency of the null GSTM1 genotype in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (56.8%) showed a statistically significant increase compared to the control group frequency (43.6%) (odds ratio (OR) = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.05-2.76). The frequency of GSTM1 null individuals was also higher among all colorectal adenocarcinoma cases, but this increase did not reach statistical significance. After grouping by tumor site, the GSTM1 null genotype was a risk factor among the subgroup with distal colorectal tumors (61.1%) (OR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.06-3.90). No consistent difference was observed between smoking patients and corresponding controls for the frequency of the GSTM1 null genotype for either cancer, although a large risk (OR = 5.76; 95% CI 1.18-28.3) was associated with the GSTM1 null genotype in the low smoking group of gastric adenocarcinoma patients. On the other hand, no statistically significant differences were observed in the frequency of null GSTT1 genotypes in gastric (47.5%) or colorectal (48.5%) adenocarcinoma patients when compared with the control population (44.4%). These results suggest that the GSTM1 null genotype may be associated with susceptibility to gastric adenocarcinoma and distal colorectal adenocarcinoma in Japanese; however, the associations observed were relatively weak and additional studies will be needed to confirm these findings.
The methylation status of 7 genes was examined in four cell lines, 36 samples of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 20 samples of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and 109 samples of prostate cancer (PCa), using methylationspecific PCR (MSP): the pi-class glutathione S-transferase (GSTP1), retinoic acid receptor beta 2(RAR2), androgen receptor (AR), death-associated protein kinase (DAPK), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP-3), O 6 -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), and hypermethylated in cancer-1 (HIC-1). The frequencies of methylation in PCa were 88% for GSTP1, 78% for RAR2, 36% for DAPK, 15% for AR, 6% for TIMP-3, and 2% for MGMT, whereas the values were 11% for AR and DAPK, 6% for TIMP-3, 3% for GSTP1, and 0 for RAR2 and MGMT in BPH. Aberrant methylation of the GSTP1 and RAR2 genes was detected in 30% and 20% of PIN, respectively. Most samples of BPH and PCa were positive for HIC-1 methylation. Regarding accumulation of methylated cancerrelated genes, there were significant correlations between PCa and BPH as well as PIN and BPH. In the present study, a high frequency of aberrant promoter methylation of the GSTP1 and RAR2 genes was noted in PCa. Our findings suggest that methylation of cancer-related genes may be involved in carcinogenesis of the prostate.
Smoking is a known risk factor for bladder cancer. The product of the GSTM1 gene, glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1), is involved in the detoxification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons found in tobacco smoke; a homozygous deletion of this gene in approximately 50% of Caucasians and Asians results in a lack of GSTM1 enzyme activity. Most studies examining the relation between bladder cancer and GSTM1 have reported an increased risk associated with a lack of GSTM1 activity. The authors performed meta- and pooled analyses of published and unpublished, case-control, genotype-based studies that examined this association (17 studies, 2,149 cases, 3,646 controls) and excluded studies conducted in populations with a high prevalence of exposure to known bladder cancer risk factors other than tobacco smoke. Using random effects models in the meta-analysis, the authors obtained a summary odds ratio of 1.44 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23, 1.68) for GSTM1 null status with all studies included. Results from studies with at least 100 cases and 100 controls produced a summary odds ratio of 1.42 (95% CI: 1.26, 1.60). Pooled analyses using original data sets from 10 studies (1,496 cases and 1,444 controls) and adjusting for age, sex, and race produced similar results. There was no evidence of multiplicative interaction between the GSTM1 null genotype and ever smoking in relation to bladder cancer, although there was a suggestion of additive interaction (additive interaction = 0.45, 95% CI: -0.03, 0.93). These results indicate that, among populations studied to date, GSTM1 null status is associated with a modest increase in the risk of bladder cancer.
The effect of genetic polymorphisms for glutathione S-transferase ( GST) M1, GSTT1, GSTP1-1( GSTP1), cytochrome P450 2E1 ( CYP2E1) and aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 ( ALDH2) on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was observed in 78 Japanese patients with HCC and 138 non-cancer hospital controls. We found a positive association between cumulative amounts of alcohol consumption (>/=600,000 ml in a lifetime) and the risk of HCC (OR=4.52, 95% CI 2.39-8.55). However, cigarette smoking was not significantly related to the risk of HCC (OR=1.23, 95% CI 0.57-2.68). The allelic frequencies of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1, CYP2E1and ALDH2of HCC patients were not significantly different from those of controls when odds ratios were only adjusted for age and gender except for any 2 alleles of ALDH2in drinkers (OR=2.53, 95% CI 1.21-5.31). However, the frequency of any C2 alleles of CYP2E1and any 2 alleles of ALDH2were significantly higher than those of controls (OR=5.77, 95% CI 1.24-27.39, OR=9.77, 95% CI 1.63-58.60) when covariates including viremia were selected by using stepwise logistic regression analysis. We conclude that habitual alcohol drinking is likely to lead to an increased risk of HCC, and any C2alleles of CYP2E1as well as any two alleles of ALDH2were also associated with an increased risk of HCC.
Alcohol drinking at high doses is a risk factor for head and neck cancer, and exposure to acetaldehyde, the principle metabolite of alcohol, is supposed to account for the increased risk. Individuals homozygous for the *2 variant allele of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) are unable to metabolize acetaldehyde, which prevents them from alcohol drinking, whereas *1*2 have 6-fold higher blood acetaldehyde concentration postalcohol consumption with respect to *1*1. According to the concept of Mendelian randomization, because this polymorphism is distributed randomly during gamete formation, its association with head and neck cancer should be not confounded by smoking. We carried out a meta-analysis of ALDH2 and head and neck cancer searching for relevant studies on Medline and Embase up to January 31, 2008, and investigated the consistency between the expected odds ratio (OR) among drinkers from the largest pooled analysis among never smokers and the observed OR from this meta-analysis by an interaction test. Six studies were selected (945 cases, 2,917 controls). The OR of head and neck cancer among *2*2 was 0.53 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.28-1.00] relative to *1*1 and 1.83 (95% CI, 1.21-2.77) among *1*2. The expected OR for head and neck cancer due to alcohol intake among *1*1 was 1.38 (95% CI, 0.88-2.17) and the observed OR among *1*1 compared with 2*2 from this meta-analysis was 1.88 (95% CI, 1.00-3.57; P for interaction = 0.43). Besides showing the effectiveness of the Mendelian randomization approach, these findings support the theory that alcohol increases head and neck cancer risk through the carcinogenic action of acetaldehyde. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(1):248-54)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.