1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1980.tb00464.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour of teeth under various loading conditions with finite element method

Abstract: A study was made of behaviour of the upper central incisor, lower second premolar and lower first molar under various loading conditions, with the finite element method. Analysis was made of tooth deflections, rotational centre, stresses in the periodontal membrane, turning moments of tooth and supporting forces of the periodontal membrane. It was shown that the horizontal vector of load was much more influential to the teeth than the vertical vector, and that effects of the loading angle on the tooth behaviou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In models where the PDL is included there is a considerable range of published E values derived from experimental studies, ranging from 0.07 to 1750 MPa (Thresher & Saito, 1973; Yettram et al. 1976; Takahashi et al. 1980; Atmaram & Mohammed, 1981; Cook et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In models where the PDL is included there is a considerable range of published E values derived from experimental studies, ranging from 0.07 to 1750 MPa (Thresher & Saito, 1973; Yettram et al. 1976; Takahashi et al. 1980; Atmaram & Mohammed, 1981; Cook et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for modelling the PDL so simply, as an isotropic, homogeneous and linear elastic material may be the plethora of experimental data that describe the complicated anisotropic and heterogeneous nature of the PDL. In models where the PDL is included there is a considerable range of published E values derived from experimental studies, ranging from 0.07 to 1750 MPa (Thresher & Saito, 1973;Yettram et al 1976;Takahashi et al 1980;Atmaram & Mohammed, 1981;Cook et al 1982;Tanne & Sakuda, 1983;Williams & Edmundson, 1984;Farah et al 1989;Andersen et al 1991;Goel et al 1992;Ko et al 1992;Korioth & Hannam, 1994). As the PDL is a loadsensitive tissue (Nokubi et al 1977;Nikishihira et al 1996;Vollmer et al 1999) it is not entirely surprising that a range of loading regimens have generated such variation in the published E values for the PDL (Thresher & Saito, 1973;Yettram et al 1976;Takahashi et al 1980;Atmaram & Mohammed, 1981;Cook et al 1982;Tanne & Sakuda, 1983;Williams & Edmundson, 1984;Farah et al 1989;Andersen et al 1991;Wilson, 1991;Goel et al 1992;Ko et al 1992;Korioth & Hannam, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This depends on the stiffness of incisors, which, in turn, is directly proportional to the residual enamel amount (27). The relation of the long axis of the tooth to the operating load renders the physiological load of upper incisors particularly disadvantageous (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the contacts established at light pressure probably guide the mandible in an anterior direction when a harder pressure is applied. Another explanation could be the different degrees of vertical mobility in molars, premolars and anterior teeth respectively, which have been shown to exist (Picton, 1963a;Takahashi, Kitagami & Komori, 1980). The greater mobility in the posterior region in combination with the localization of the elevator muscles leads to some intrusion of the posterior teeth at hard pressure with more anterior teeth contacts as a consequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%