2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour and fate of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in drinking water treatment: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
408
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 705 publications
(418 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
9
408
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data clearly confirm that chlorine-based oxidants are ineffective for PFAS removal (Rahman et al 2014).…”
Section: Concentrations In Drinking Water Resources and In Treated Watersupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These data clearly confirm that chlorine-based oxidants are ineffective for PFAS removal (Rahman et al 2014).…”
Section: Concentrations In Drinking Water Resources and In Treated Watersupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Most compounds in the influent and effluent of plant A were found almost at the same levels, suggesting that biodegradation in activated sludge process and UV degradation played negligible role in their removal. This can be explained by the structures of PFCAs and PFSAs containing strong CeF bond and the electron withdrawing functional groups eCOOH and eSO 3 H, also indicating that these compounds will be likely resistant to oxidation, biodegradation, and reaction by hydroxyl radicals (Rahman et al, 2014). Plant B consists of conventional A 2 O combined with advanced MBR process, of which the MBR removed approximately 49% for PFOA, 55% for PFNA and 56% for PFDA, respectively; in contrast the removal of the short chain PFASs was very limited.…”
Section: Removal Efficiencies and Mechanisms Of Pfass In Wwtps And Dwtpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the review, existing knowledge gaps are identified, and future research directions are proposed in this study. This paper is complementary to previous publications on PFASs that reviewed physiochemical properties (Ding and Peijnenburg 2013;Buck et al 2011), microbial degradation (Liu and Avendano 2013), occurrence and fate in aquatic environment (Ahrens 2011), drinking water treatment processes (Rahman, Peldszus, and Anderson 2014) and WWTPs (Arvaniti and Stasinakis 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%