1965
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pa.05.040165.001315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Pharmacology

Abstract: It is the purpose of this review to present an integrated, selective, and constructively critical summary of major current trends in behavioral pharmacology. This rather formidable task has been accomplished in at least two relatively recent reviews by Dews & Morse in 1961 (1) and Cook & Kelleher in 1963 (2). The excellence of these contributions lightens the literature-survey burden prior to these dates. Our coverage of major trends, involving the effects of specific classes of drugs upon behavior, pharmaco l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This enhancement by magnesium pemoline of learning and memory in the "jump-out" test is unusual since both methamphetamine and methylpheni- (11) in a pole-climbing test. These negative findings with amphetamine in the gross operant avoidance test systems (jump-out, pole climb, hurdle cross) are contrasted sharply to positive effects in facilitating acquisition in the instrumental (bar-pressing) avoidance test (12). Certainly, differences of such magnitude between the effects of amphetamine and magnesium pemoline on acquisition rates in the gross operant jump-out test may be explained in terms of possible changes in anxiety or alertness levels or both.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This enhancement by magnesium pemoline of learning and memory in the "jump-out" test is unusual since both methamphetamine and methylpheni- (11) in a pole-climbing test. These negative findings with amphetamine in the gross operant avoidance test systems (jump-out, pole climb, hurdle cross) are contrasted sharply to positive effects in facilitating acquisition in the instrumental (bar-pressing) avoidance test (12). Certainly, differences of such magnitude between the effects of amphetamine and magnesium pemoline on acquisition rates in the gross operant jump-out test may be explained in terms of possible changes in anxiety or alertness levels or both.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A series of excellent reviews of behavioral effects of drugs (6)(7)(8)(9)(10) have included various stressful test situations. Their coverage of the literature was necessarily selective and abbreviated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And it has been confirmed in many reports (11)(12)(13) and summarized in many reviews (8,(14)(15)(16)(17) that the avoidance response specifically reflects the inhibitory effect of neuroleptics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%