2020
DOI: 10.1111/rec.13159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior change and sustainability of ecological restoration projects

Abstract: Addressing socio‐economic factors in ecological restoration projects is critical for the effectiveness of restoration practices and scaling of restoration efforts. To achieve sustainability of restoration projects, the drivers of human activity leading to the degradation need to be addressed. An under‐researched concept in ecological restoration is the impact of behavior change of stakeholders and communities involved, despite the strong link prior research has shown to exist between environmental quality and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current definition of ecosystem restoration used by the Decade also includes a wide range of ecosystem management interventions, “from reducing societal impacts in production landscapes to fully recovering native ecosystems” (UNEP 2021), allowing the balance between socioeconomic and ecological goals to be considered. The ecological restoration field has started to recognize the importance of integrating socioeconomic thinking into restoration projects (Higgs et al 2018; Lengefeld et al 2020). The second edition of the Society of Ecological Restoration Guidelines (Gann et al 2019) took a major step in this direction, establishing stakeholders as integral to the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current definition of ecosystem restoration used by the Decade also includes a wide range of ecosystem management interventions, “from reducing societal impacts in production landscapes to fully recovering native ecosystems” (UNEP 2021), allowing the balance between socioeconomic and ecological goals to be considered. The ecological restoration field has started to recognize the importance of integrating socioeconomic thinking into restoration projects (Higgs et al 2018; Lengefeld et al 2020). The second edition of the Society of Ecological Restoration Guidelines (Gann et al 2019) took a major step in this direction, establishing stakeholders as integral to the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These readings presented two possible paths to resolve the ecological crisis we are facing: either dealing with it by changing people’s behavior or solving it through the creation of efficient technology. Changes in human behavior are identified as crucial in achieving sustainability (Lengfeld et al, 2020 ). By being part of ACS, I have become familiar with possible technological changes and applications that might help address environmental issues.…”
Section: Reflections: Our Journeys As Acs Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the impact of ecological restoration on the supply of ecosystem services is not consistent in different regions. Many studies believe that ecological restoration have improved the stability of ecosystems such as forests, grasslands, and wetlands, and curbed the deterioration of the ecosystem itself [11], along with improving the supply capacity of ecosystem services. However, other studies have found that the dilemma of insufficient ecosystem services in economic and industrial functional zones has not been improved, although forests, grasslands, wetlands and other ecosystems themselves have been restored [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%