Long-Term Imprisonment: Policy, Science, and Correctional Practice 1995
DOI: 10.4135/9781483327228.n14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior and Adaptation in Long-Term Prison Inmates: Descriptive Longitudinal Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
3
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
81
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The agency provided detailed behavioral histories along with individual specific data on all male inmates sentenced to state prisons between August 2004 and June 2006. Research indicates that misconduct is most likely to occur within the first three years of incarceration (Adams, 1992;Bottoms, 1999;Flanagan, 1980;Griffin & Hepburn, 2006;Zamble, 1992). Therefore, inmates who served a prison sentence of less than three years were removed from the sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The agency provided detailed behavioral histories along with individual specific data on all male inmates sentenced to state prisons between August 2004 and June 2006. Research indicates that misconduct is most likely to occur within the first three years of incarceration (Adams, 1992;Bottoms, 1999;Flanagan, 1980;Griffin & Hepburn, 2006;Zamble, 1992). Therefore, inmates who served a prison sentence of less than three years were removed from the sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Prior research has demonstrated that the frequency of misconduct is highest early in the sentence, typically reaching its peak six to nine months into the sentence, then falling steadily with the passage of time (Maguire, 1992;Toch, Adams, & Grant, 1989;Wright, 1991;Zamble, 1992). Inmate misconduct rates, particularly for individuals with short sentences, fit an inverted U-shaped curve (Flanagan, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Zamble, 1992), noise (e.g., Cohen & Weinstein, 1981), unemployment (Lucas, Clark, Georgellis, & Diener, 2004), divorce (Lucas, 2005), and, on the positive side, marriage (e.g., Lucas, Clark, Georgellis, & Diener, 2003), increases in income (Diener & Biswas-Diener, 2002), and winning lotteries (e.g., Brickman, Coates, & Janoff-Bulman, 1978). Reviewers of these literatures have observed that people appear to adapt more easily in some domains than they do in others; for example, Frederick and Loewenstein (1999) noted that people adapt more easily to incarceration than to unpleasant noises, and Lucas et al (2004) found that losing one's job is particularly difficult to adapt to and has a long-term impact on life satisfaction.…”
Section: To What Kinds Of Events Do People Adapt Most Quickly?mentioning
confidence: 99%