2005
DOI: 10.2737/rmrs-gtr-106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BehavePlus fire modeling system, version 4.0: User's Guide

Abstract: This publication has been revised to reflect updates made to version 3 of the BehavePlus software, it was originally published as the BehavePlus fire modeling system, version 2.0 User's Guide in June, 2003 The BehavePlus fire modeling system is a program for personal computers that is a collection of mathematical models that describe fire and the fire environment. It is a flexible system that produces tables, graphs, and simple diagrams. It can be used for a multitude of fire management applications includi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
151
0
16

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
151
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…He chose this kind of vegetation because of its clear stratification and its low fuel arrangement variability compared with naturally regenerated areas. Although Rothermel's [68] and Van Wagner's [80,81] models have empirical character and present various assumptions and limitations, nevertheless they have been incorporated in most wildland fire predictions systems such as the Canadian Forest Fire Prediction System [32], FARSITE [31], NEXUS [70] and BehavePlus version 3 [12]. Cruz et al [22,25] modeled crown fire rate of spread through non-linear regression analysis based on an experimental dataset which covered a broad spectrum of fuel complexes and fire behavior characteristics.…”
Section: Crown Fire Spreadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He chose this kind of vegetation because of its clear stratification and its low fuel arrangement variability compared with naturally regenerated areas. Although Rothermel's [68] and Van Wagner's [80,81] models have empirical character and present various assumptions and limitations, nevertheless they have been incorporated in most wildland fire predictions systems such as the Canadian Forest Fire Prediction System [32], FARSITE [31], NEXUS [70] and BehavePlus version 3 [12]. Cruz et al [22,25] modeled crown fire rate of spread through non-linear regression analysis based on an experimental dataset which covered a broad spectrum of fuel complexes and fire behavior characteristics.…”
Section: Crown Fire Spreadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perimeter of the fire at the end of each short time step is then defined by a line that encloses each of these new wavelets. Finney (1998) combined Richards (1990), BEHAVE (Andrews et al 2005), and the basic fire-spread models of Rothermel (1972Rothermel ( , 1983 to develop a fire growth modelling platform, FARSITE, which has been used for operational fire behaviour analysis, planning and research. Finney (2002) later developed a more efficient algorithm to simulate fire growth, similar to that of Kourtz et al (1977), based on minimum travel time methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2-2-Fuel moisture time lag, size class and description (Schroeder and Buck 1970). These size classes are commonly used in fire danger rating (Deeming and others 1978), fire behavior prediction (Rothermel 1972, Albini 1976, Andrews 2008, and fuel consumption calculations (Reinhardt andothers 2005, Ottmar andothers 2007 Finely divided (small) fuel particles have high SAVs, wet and dry quickly, and ignite and burn out quickly. The larger the SAV, the faster particles ignite and burn (table 2-2).…”
Section: Fire Behavior and Effects: Concepts And Models _____________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vegetative biomass fuels are of a class of chemicals called polymers consisting of cellulose (41-53%), hemicellulose (15-20%), and lignin (16-33%), with lesser amounts of secondary plant metabolites (for example fats, oils, waxes, resin), and minerals (calcium, potassium, magnesium, silica) (DeBano and others 1998;Grishin 1997;Pyne and others 1996;Ward 2001). Wildland fuels are described by their physical and chemical properties when modeling fire danger or potential fire behavior in the United States (Albini 1976;Andrews 2005;Deeming and others 1977;Rothermel 1972), but in Canada they are described by a vegetation-based physiognomic nomenclature (for example, dominant species composition and stand structure) (Hirsch 1996;Stocks and others 1989;Wotton and others 2009). Likewise, field ecology studies primarily rely on vegetative physiognomic characteristics to characterize fuels and fire potential.…”
Section: Fire Behavior and Effects: Concepts And Models _____________mentioning
confidence: 99%