Beginning with the end in mind: implications for project design

Carvalho, Soniya; Perkins, Gillian; Reid, Gary

doi:10.1080/19439342.2015.1098720

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Buttenheim, 2010;Keating, Campbell, Mechier, Magnuszewski, Mochizuki, Liu, Szoenyi and McQuistan, 2017;Keating, Campbell, Szoenyi, McQuistan, Nash and Burer, 2017). For this, ideally, the projects could be implemented with measurable evaluation tools already in place at the initial design stage (Buttenheim, 2010;Carvalho et al, 2015;Prowse and Snilstveit, 2010).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gaps in post-disaster community changes in “building back better” in Ayeyarwaddy, Myanmar

Yang

2020

DPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the effectiveness of disaster risk reduction (DRR) projects carried out by a Korean NGO in Ayeyarwaddy, Myanmar. The paper discusses project effectiveness, community participation and sustainability in disaster preparedness as well as the “build back better” concept. Design/methodology/approach The findings are drawn from a mixed methods approach consisting of focus groups, interviews of key stakeholders and a cross-sectional community household survey comparing project and neighbouring villages. Findings Project villages were better prepared in terms of increased awareness and participation in DRR activities. However, the qualitative data showed a low level of participation, facilitating limited changes and leaving the element of sustainability in question. Most activities were responsive rather than preventive. Research limitations/implications The study faced unavoidable constraints. The author was invited to assess the project only after implementation, precluding a controlled trial. With time at the site limited, an alternative systematic post hoc evaluation strategies were not feasible. The triangulation of data manages these methodological challenges to the extent possible. Still, that the positive findings on preparedness and capacity changes derive from self-assessment should be kept in mind. Practical implications Where appropriate, DRR projects should include measurable evaluation tools from the project design stage. DRR as a goal in of itself is not adequate to transform the region. Instead, DRR projects should consider “development-centred disaster resilience” as the ultimate goal to aim toward. Originality/value There have been virtually no assessments of regional DRR project effectiveness in Myanmar. The study applies the Sendai Framework as an analytical framework to assess community-based DRR, which could also be applied to other contexts.

show abstract