2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00756.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy experience with 72 critically ill patients

Abstract: Tracheostomy is necessary in intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. As an alternative to the standard surgical method, percutaneous techniques are available. Seventy-two patients were electively selected for percutaneous tracheostomy (PCT) in a nine-bed combined medical-surgical intensive care unit. PCT was performed at bedside with the Portex Percutaneous Tracheostomy Kit that uses the Griggs technique. The procedure time and early complications were recorded. The proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tracheostomy has several advantages over endotracheal intubation, including lower airway resistance, smaller dead space, less movement of the tube within the trachea, greater patient comfort and more efficient suction [4,5]. Although recent studies have suggested that tracheostomy can be a safe procedure in the ICU [6,7], tracheostomy has also been found to lead to serious complications, including tracheal stenosis, increased bacterial colonization and haemorrhage [8,9]. Many critically ill patients' families have been hesitant in authorizing tracheostomy because of cosmetic issues and speech problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracheostomy has several advantages over endotracheal intubation, including lower airway resistance, smaller dead space, less movement of the tube within the trachea, greater patient comfort and more efficient suction [4,5]. Although recent studies have suggested that tracheostomy can be a safe procedure in the ICU [6,7], tracheostomy has also been found to lead to serious complications, including tracheal stenosis, increased bacterial colonization and haemorrhage [8,9]. Many critically ill patients' families have been hesitant in authorizing tracheostomy because of cosmetic issues and speech problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a 3 - center clinical trial of early (within 48 hours) versus delayed (day 14-16) tracheostomy in 120 medical ICU patients, Rumbak et al ., found the duration of MV to be 7.6 ± 4 days in the early tracheostomy group as compared to 17.4 ± 5.3 days in the late tracheostomy group. [1] Exposure of our patient to this slow weaning process and the associated risks of tracheostomy (hemorrhage, misplacement, pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, and tracheal or esophageal injury)[4] struck us as questionable in view of the fact that except for his airway irritability, the infective pathology had been successfully treated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2016;5(84):6249-6252, DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2016/1413 BACKGROUND Tracheostomy is required in critically ill patients to manage airway on a long term basis. 1 Indications of tracheostomy have not changed, but its timing has been questioned though shown to have definite effect on the outcome of the underlying disease. 2,3 Among the surgical procedures performed in critically ill patients in ICU setup tracheostomy accounts to 24%.…”
Section: How To Cite This Articlementioning
confidence: 99%