Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study

Cruse, D. Alan; Chennu, Srivas; Chatelle, Camille; Bekinschtein, Tristán A.; Fernández‐Espejo, Davinia; Pickard, John D.; Laureys, Steven; Owen, Adrian M.

doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61224-5

“…The fact that a scanner is needed limits its use to a hospital setting and precludes application in patients with metal implants or in critical condition in intensive care. Active command paradigms combined with EEG [45][46][47] or electromyography [48] are more wieldy solutions, which have already permitted the detection of voluntary brain function in patients with VS/UWS and enabled functional communication with patients with complete locked-in syndrome (i.e., fully conscious but completely paralyzed including eye movement [49]). …”

Section: Detection Of Awareness In Disorders Of Consciousnessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional neuroanatomy of disorders of consciousness

Perri

¹

,

Stender

²

,

Laureys

³

et al. 2014

Epilepsy & Behavior

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. Our understanding of the mechanisms of loss and recovery of consciousness, following severe brain injury or during anesthesia, is changing rapidly. Recent neuroimaging studies have shown that patients with chronic disorders of consciousness and subjects undergoing general anesthesia present a complex dysfunctionality in the architecture of brain connectivity. At present, the global hallmark of impaired consciousness appears to be a multifaceted dysfunctional connectivity pattern with both within-network loss of connectivity in a widespread frontoparietal network and between-network hyperconnectivity involving other regions such as the insula and ventral tegmental area. Despite ongoing efforts, the mechanisms underlying the emergence of consciousness after severe brain injury are not thoroughly understood. Important questions remain unanswered: What triggers the connectivity impairment leading to disorders of consciousness? Why do some patients recover from coma, while others with apparently similar brain injuries do not? Understanding these mechanisms could lead to a better comprehension of brain function and, hopefully, lead to new therapeutic strategies in this challenging patient population.This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Epilepsy and Consciousness.

show abstract

“…As soon as the patient was taken out of the MRI machine, no communication whatsoever was possible. Hence, portable and cheaper EEG-based equivalents [(e.g., 42,43,44)] have been developed for more routine clinical use [(for recent review see 45)]. Such brain computer interfaces (BCI) have already been used successfully in real clinical settings.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consciousness supporting networks

Demertzi¹,

Soddu²,

Laureys³

2013

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. Author's personal copy In most cases authors Consciousness supporting networksAthena Demertzi, Andrea Soddu and Steven LaureysFunctional neuroimaging shows that patients with disorders of consciousness exhibit disrupted system-level functional connectivity. Unresponsive/''vegetative state'' patients preserve wakefulness networks of brainstem and basal forebrain but the cerebral networks accounting for external perceptual awareness and internal self-related mentation are disrupted. Specifically, the 'external awareness' network encompassing lateral fronto-temporo-parietal cortices bilaterally, and the 'internal awareness' network including midline anterior cingulate/mesiofrontal and posterior cingulate/ precuneal cortices, are functionally disconnected. By contrast, patients in minimally conscious state 'minus', who show nonreflex behaviors, are characterized by right-lateralized recovery of the external awareness network. Similarly, patients who evolve to minimally conscious state 'plus' and respond to commands recover the dominant left-lateralized language network. Now, the use of active experimental paradigms targeting at detecting motor-independent signs of awareness or even establishing communication with these patients, challenge these two clinical boundaries. Such advances are naturally accompanied by legitimate neuroscientific and ethical queries demanding our attention on the medical implementations of this new knowledge. What is 'minimally conscious'?At present there is no generally accepted definition of consciousness [1]. As clinicians, we will reduce the complexity of this term and define consciousness operationally, separating two main components: wakefulness and awareness [2]. Wakefulness has been shown to critically depend upon the functional integrity of subcortical arousal systems over 50 years ago [(e.g., see 3)]. The level of wakefulness can be estimated by simple behavioral criteria based on eye opening ranging from absent, over stimulus-induced to spontaneous sustained eye opening.For instance, every night when falling asleep, we experience a decrease of the level of wakefulness up to the point we lose awareness of our environment. Awareness is more difficult to define and more challenging to assess behaviorally [4]. We have recently proposed to reduce the phenomenological complexity of awareness into two further components: external awareness, namely everything we perceive through our senses (what we see, hear, feel, smell and taste), and internal awareness or stimulusindependent thoughts. Interestingly, the switch between the external and internal milieu was found not only to characterize overt...

show abstract

“…Différentes réponses cérébrales peuvent être détectées par une interface cerveau-ordinateur utilisant l'EEG (EEG-BCI). Parmi les réponses électrophysiologiques les plus utilisées, qui sont les potentiels corticaux lents 1 [15], les rythmes sensori-moteurs 2 [16], les potentiels évoqués 3 P300 4 [17] et les potentiels évoqués visuels steady-state (steady-state visually evoked potential, SSVEP) 5 [18,19], deux ont été évaluées comme outil de détection d'une réponse à une commande dans le contexte des troubles de la conscience. Il s'agit des rythmes sensori-moteurs, qui reflétent un changement de l'activité cérébrale dans les régions motrices suite à l'imagination d'un mouvement, et la P300, qui révèle une réponse évoquée par la présentation d'un stimulus inattendu, au sein de stimulus fréquents.…”

Section: Vers Un Paradigme Visuel Indépendantunclassified