Functional neuroanatomy of disorders of consciousness

Abstract

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. Our understanding of the mechanisms of loss and recovery of consciousness, following severe brain injury or during anesthesia, is changing rapidly. Recent neuroimaging studies have shown that patients with chronic disorders of consciousness and subjects undergoing general anesthesia present a complex dysfunctionality in the architecture of brain connectivity. At present, the global hallmark of impaired consciousness appears to be a multifaceted dysfunctional connectivity pattern with both within-network loss of connectivity in a widespread frontoparietal network and between-network hyperconnectivity involving other regions such as the insula and ventral tegmental area. Despite ongoing efforts, the mechanisms underlying the emergence of consciousness after severe brain injury are not thoroughly understood. Important questions remain unanswered: What triggers the connectivity impairment leading to disorders of consciousness? Why do some patients recover from coma, while others with apparently similar brain injuries do not? Understanding these mechanisms could lead to a better comprehension of brain function and, hopefully, lead to new therapeutic strategies in this challenging patient population.This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Epilepsy and Consciousness.

Stratification of unresponsive patients by an independently validated index of brain complexity

“…TMS targets were selected bilaterally within the middle‐caudal portion of the superior frontal gyrus (BA6 and BA8) and within the superior parietal lobule (BA7), about 1cm lateral to the midline. These targets were chosen because they are part of a cortical network that has been suggested to be relevant for consciousness19, 20, 21 and because they are far from the insertion of head muscles that may induce TMS‐related artifacts 22. In brain‐injured patients, the stimulation of targets affected by cortical lesions identified on individual MR images was deliberately avoided because, in these cases, TMS is ineffective and does not evoke measureable responses 23.…”

Additional Value of FDG PET and Resting State-functional MRI for the Assessment of Consciousness Disorders in Hypoglycemia-induced Coma

“…In fact, the last few years two main functional connectivity networks have been identified: the external awareness network (FPN) which subserves consciousness of the environment and the internal awareness network or default mode network (DMN) that appears to be related to selfrelated processes [4]. rs-fMRI studies have pointed out the importance of the DMN to distinguish coma, vegetative state, minimally conscious state and locked in syndrome as DMN connectivity correlates with the degree of consciousness [5].…”

The impact and dissemination of scientific research: From impact factor to social media. The Top 10 articles in Epilepsy & Behavior published in 2014

“…Scientific communities need to be aware of the potential impact of social media. [11] 13 March 2014 Article 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 6 31 Reilly et al [12] 16 Dec 2014 Article 1 14 1 0 3 0 0 0 19 Wakeford et al [13] 30 Oct 2014 Article 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Ettinger et al [14] 11 [19] 15 Feb 2014 Review 1779 Laxer et al [20] 27 June 2014 Review 1610 Szaflarski and Bebin [21] 01 Oct 2014 Review 1570 Di Perri et al [22] 01 Jan 2014 Review 1420 Ramgopal et al [23] 29 Aug 2014 Review 1314 Shetty [24] 13 Jan 2014 Review 1042 Juruena [25] 01 …”