2001
DOI: 10.14509/2768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bedrock geologic map of the Chulitna region, southcentral Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crustal thickness and character of the suture zone proper (i.e., central section) does not vary greatly across the transects (Figures 4a–4d), suggesting that this region which broadens westward has experienced distributed deformation during Mesozoic collision and that deformation was likely not localized along a major discrete structure. This interpretation is consistent with geologic studies within the central section that document highly deformed, often isoclinally folded strata [ Reed and Nelson , 1980; Csejtey et al , 1992; Clautice et al , 2001; Eastham and Ridgway , 2002]. The presence of intracrustal discontinuities within the central section, the current crustal thickness, and geometry and relationship of the boundaries of this section with the former continental margin and allochthonous terrane, suggests that deformation was also accommodated within the middle and lower crust (Figures 4a–4d).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The crustal thickness and character of the suture zone proper (i.e., central section) does not vary greatly across the transects (Figures 4a–4d), suggesting that this region which broadens westward has experienced distributed deformation during Mesozoic collision and that deformation was likely not localized along a major discrete structure. This interpretation is consistent with geologic studies within the central section that document highly deformed, often isoclinally folded strata [ Reed and Nelson , 1980; Csejtey et al , 1992; Clautice et al , 2001; Eastham and Ridgway , 2002]. The presence of intracrustal discontinuities within the central section, the current crustal thickness, and geometry and relationship of the boundaries of this section with the former continental margin and allochthonous terrane, suggests that deformation was also accommodated within the middle and lower crust (Figures 4a–4d).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A model that invokes the initiation of back-arc rifting is consistent with evidence that strata were deposited within a rift basin. We fi nd no geochemical indication that these rocks are fl ood basalts, as would be expected if they were analogous to the Nikolai greenstones of the Wrangellia terrane (Clautice et al, 2001), although this could be a local variant where trace-element chemistry is infl uenced by subarc mantle. Based on this model of arc rifting, we interpret ultramafi c slivers and volcanics of the Devonian Chulitna basement as a suprasubduction ophiolite, similar to younger Upper Triassic mafi c and ultramafi c rocks between the Wrangellia composite terrane and North America in the Lake Clark region (Amato et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Tropical faunas from Triassic strata of the Chulitna terrane are consistent with an origin exotic to North America (Nokleberg et al, 1994) and suggest an affi nity with the Wrangellia composite terrane. The existence of a Paleozoic arc with a thick sequence of Late Triassic tholeiitic basalt shows a similarity to the stratigraphy of Wrangellia (Clautice et al, 2001). However, the existence of a Triassic red-bed sequence overlying basement along an unconformity is also observed in the Alexander terrane (Gehrels et al, 1996).…”
Section: Geology Of the Chulitna Terranementioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations