2004
DOI: 10.1080/13678860310001630647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Becoming’ critically reflective practitioners: academics' and students' reflections on the issues involved

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the reflection construct is receiving considerable attention in a wide range of disciplines including social work (Dempsey et al, 2001;Fisher and Somerton, 2000), information systems (Mukherjee, 2004), earth sciences (Harrison et al, 2003), leadership development (Densten & Gray, 2001) and particularly in the areas of human resource development (Bourner, 2003;Corley & Eades, 2004;Maclellan, 2004;Van Woerkom, 2004;Van Woerkom et al, 2002) and health sciences (Biggs et al, 2001;Kember et al, 2000;Leung & Kember, 2003;Liimatainen et al, 2001). We examine this diverse literature base and blend it with emerging business education literature for the purpose of defining the reflection construct, identifying its dimensions and processes, and as input for further consideration of its measurement.…”
Section: Review Of Reflection Literature and Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reflection construct is receiving considerable attention in a wide range of disciplines including social work (Dempsey et al, 2001;Fisher and Somerton, 2000), information systems (Mukherjee, 2004), earth sciences (Harrison et al, 2003), leadership development (Densten & Gray, 2001) and particularly in the areas of human resource development (Bourner, 2003;Corley & Eades, 2004;Maclellan, 2004;Van Woerkom, 2004;Van Woerkom et al, 2002) and health sciences (Biggs et al, 2001;Kember et al, 2000;Leung & Kember, 2003;Liimatainen et al, 2001). We examine this diverse literature base and blend it with emerging business education literature for the purpose of defining the reflection construct, identifying its dimensions and processes, and as input for further consideration of its measurement.…”
Section: Review Of Reflection Literature and Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…209). Furthermore, that reflective learning requires time and space is a consistent finding from research (see, for example, Corley & Eades, 2004;Forneris & Peden-McAlpine, 2007;Warhurst, 2008).…”
Section: Reflective Practice 391mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, despite some limited success in terms of critical consciousness-raising in formal education settings (see, for example, Corley and Eades 2004;Cunliffe 2004;Lawless et al 2011;Sinclair 2007) and the occasional but rare empirical example of something similar in work settings (notably Brooks 1999;Rigg and Trehan 2008), critical reflection falls short of this ideal in practice (Fenwick 2005b, 36). This raises questions as to whether it is not just 'too difficult' to operate in a workplace (Rigg and Trehan 2008).…”
Section: The Impasse Unpackedmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The purpose is to think through a difficult impasse that exists in relation to its role as the mainstay pedagogical approach of CHRD (Corley and Eades 2004;Lawless et al 2011;Monaghan and Cervero 2006;Rigg andTrehan 2004, 2008). This impasse refers to an apparent means-end misalignment between CHRD and practitioner aims.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%