2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bearing-based formation tracking control of AUVs with optimal gains tuning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A finite-time bearing-only control law is proposed based on the inverse of the minimum eigenvalue of the sum of the local projection matrices. Formation tracking via bearing-only estimation for time-varying leader-follower formations was also proposed in [44], [45], [46], [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A finite-time bearing-only control law is proposed based on the inverse of the minimum eigenvalue of the sum of the local projection matrices. Formation tracking via bearing-only estimation for time-varying leader-follower formations was also proposed in [44], [45], [46], [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assumption 2 is often used in the bearing‐only distributed formation control problem as in References 22‐28, which guarantees that there is no collision between the agents. It can be realized by the behavior‐based control approach where if the distance between the agents is smaller than the safety distance, a repulsive force is triggered to avoid the collisions.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some continuous methods to solve the bearing-only formation control problem, [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] where the agents are driven to form the desired formation shape. In Reference 25, bearing rigidity theory is utilized to investigate the formation control problem of multi-agent systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1. Assumption 1, which is commonly used in addressing bearing-based formation control problems [28,41], ensures that only unique formations can be achieved through control approaches. This assumption is crucial because it allows for the precise determination of the desired position and velocity of each follower when the bearing-based formation is unique.…”
Section: Assumption 1 Graph G Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let A be a symmetric and positive semidefinite matrix and italicNull()A ⊥ denotes the orthogonal complement of italicNull()A. Then for any nonzero vector xitalicNull()A ⊥ , the following inequality holds 0<λm()AxTitalicAx,where λm()A denotes the smallest positive eigenvalue of matrix A.Assumption Graph G()p satisfies the infinitesimally bearing rigid condition, and Bff is positive definite.Remark Assumption 1, which is commonly used in addressing bearing‐based formation control problems [28, 41], ensures that only unique formations can be achieved through control approaches. This assumption is crucial because it allows for the precise determination of the desired position and velocity of each follower when the bearing‐based formation is unique.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%