Bean Common Mosaic Virus and Bean Common Mosaic Necrosis Virus

Worrall, Elizabeth A.; Wamonje, Francis O.; Mukeshimana, Gerardine; Harvey, Jagger; Carr, John P.; Mitter, Neena

doi:10.1016/bs.aivir.2015.04.002

Cited by 76 publications

(86 citation statements)

References 174 publications

(257 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…BCMV and BCMNV are transmitted in common bean seeds by several aphids in a non-persistent manner (Spence and Walkey, 1995). Aspects of taxonomy and transmission of these viruses were recently reviewed (Worrall et al, 2015) and are beyond the scope of this review.…”

Section: Viruses and Virus Diseases Of Common Beanmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The history of BCMV and BCMNV traces back to 1917 when all strains of these viruses were considered as pathogenically identical and in literature they were assigned different names including bean mosaic virus, bean virus 1 and phaseolus virus 1 (Worrall et al, 2015). According to Kulkarni and Muguga (1973), viruses causing bean common mosaic disease were reported in Kenya and Tanzania in 1936.…”

Section: Viruses and Virus Diseases Of Common Beanmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This was the first published account of occurrence of the temperature insensitive necrosis-causing strain of BCMV in Tanzania. This strain has since been named TN1 (Silbernagel et al, 1986;Worrall et al, 2015). To date, serotype A isolates have been reclassified as BCMNV but serotype B isolates are BCMV (Worrall et al, 2015).…”

Section: Viruses and Virus Diseases Of Common Beanmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This strain has since been named TN1 (Silbernagel et al, 1986;Worrall et al, 2015). To date, serotype A isolates have been reclassified as BCMNV but serotype B isolates are BCMV (Worrall et al, 2015). BCMNV occurs at higher incidences compared with BCMV and its origin is believed to be wild plants in central and southern Africa (Spence and Walkey, 1995).…”

Section: Viruses and Virus Diseases Of Common Beanmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There have also been reviews on different aspects of common bean production in the country (Hillocks et al, 2006;Tryphone et al, 2013) but none focused on common bean virus diseases, which can cause 100% yield loss (Worrall et al, 2015). Particularly, previous reviews have not focused on the common bean virus diseases concerning their areas of incidence, distribution and approaches for detecting their causal agents.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Viruses infecting common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Tanzania: A review on molecular characterization, detection and disease management options

Mwaipopo¹,

Nchimbi‐Msolla²,

Njau³

et al. 2017

Afr. J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a major legume crop, serving as a main source of dietary protein and calories and generating income for many Tanzanians. It is produced in nearly all agroecological zones of Tanzania. However, the average yields are low (<1000 kg/ha), which is attributed to many factors including virus diseases. The most important viruses of common bean in Tanzania are Bean common mosaic virus (BCMV) and Bean common mosaic necrosis virus (BCMNV) but other viruses have also been reported. There has never been a review of common bean virus diseases in the country, and the lack of collated information makes their management difficult. Therefore, this review focuses on (1) occurrence of different viruses of common bean in Tanzania, (2) molecular characterization of these viruses, (3) detection tools for common bean viruses in Tanzania and (4) available options for managing virus diseases in the country. Literature and nucleotide sequence database searches revealed that common bean diseases are inadequately studied and that their causal viruses have not been adequately characterized at the molecular level in Tanzania. Increased awareness on common bean virus diseases in Tanzania is expected to result into informed development of strategies for management of the same and thus increased production, which in turn has implication on nutrition and income.

show abstract

Section: Viruses and Virus Diseases Of Common Beanmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Viruses and Virus Diseases Of Common Beanmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Viruses and Virus Diseases Of Common Beanmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Viruses and Virus Diseases Of Common Beanmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Viruses infecting common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Tanzania: A review on molecular characterization, detection and disease management options

Mwaipopo¹,

Nchimbi‐Msolla²,

Njau³

et al. 2017

Afr. J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Anthracnose and bean common mosaic necrosis virus resistance in wild and landrace Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) genetic stocks

Awale,

Wiersma,

Wright

et al. 2024

Crop Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wild crop germplasm and landrace varieties have long been considered as a source of novel genetic variation for improving domesticated crops. Due to genetic bottlenecks that occurred during domestication, dissemination, and subsequent crop improvement, many beneficial genes are absent from commercial varieties and elite breeding germplasm, yet are still present in wild populations. To catalog potential novel disease resistance genes useful for breeding more resilient dry beans, we screened wild and landrace Phaseolus vulgaris L. accessions archived in the USDA GRIN seed bank for untapped resistance to anthracnose (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum) and bean common mosaic necrosis virus (BCMNV). A population of 194 wild and 55 landrace accessions were screened for resistance to two highly virulent races of anthracnose (race 2047 and race 3481) and for resistance to the BCMNV strain NL‐3. Thirteen accessions, all wild, were resistant to both anthracnose races, with MX‐QT‐3 and PI 661812 displaying complete resistance with no disease symptoms across all replications. Surprisingly, no natural resistance to BCMNV strain NL‐3 was detected in the wild germplasm. PI 442541, PI 661891, and W6 10164 were the only three accessions that expressed the I‐gene phenotype and all three have some history of cultivation. This study provides a resource for introgression of genetic diversity for anthracnose resistance into cultivated beans and reveals that innate resistance to BCMNV may not exist in wild populations of P. vulgaris.

show abstract

Genetic Engineering of Grain Legumes: Their Potential for Sustainable Agriculture and Food and Nutritional Security

Acharjee

Higgins

2021

Genetic Enhancement in Major Food Legumes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bean Common Mosaic Virus and Bean Common Mosaic Necrosis Virus

Cited by 76 publications

References 174 publications

Viruses infecting common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Tanzania: A review on molecular characterization, detection and disease management options

Viruses infecting common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Tanzania: A review on molecular characterization, detection and disease management options

Anthracnose and bean common mosaic necrosis virus resistance in wild and landrace Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) genetic stocks

Genetic Engineering of Grain Legumes: Their Potential for Sustainable Agriculture and Food and Nutritional Security

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About