2009
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2009.2019923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beamforming in the Presence of Mutual Coupling Based on Constrained Particle Swarm Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many constraint-handling techniques have been developed for PSO, such as penalty function method (Chaturvedi et al, 2009;Coello, 2002;Demarcke et al, 2009), the method based on lexicographical order of solutions (Demarcke et al, 2009), and the method based on modified replacement procedure (Pulido and Coello, 2004;Zielinski et al, 2009). The core idea of the first approach is that the objective function is augmented by a weighted version of the constraint (penalty) function, and the weight factor is so-called penalty factor.…”
Section: Constraint Handling In Iapsomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many constraint-handling techniques have been developed for PSO, such as penalty function method (Chaturvedi et al, 2009;Coello, 2002;Demarcke et al, 2009), the method based on lexicographical order of solutions (Demarcke et al, 2009), and the method based on modified replacement procedure (Pulido and Coello, 2004;Zielinski et al, 2009). The core idea of the first approach is that the objective function is augmented by a weighted version of the constraint (penalty) function, and the weight factor is so-called penalty factor.…”
Section: Constraint Handling In Iapsomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, particle swarm optimization (PSO) method proposed by Kennedy and Eberhart (1995) has been a popular method used for solving complex nonlinear optimization problems such as optimal economic power dispatch in power system (Chaturvedi et al, 2009;Gaing, 2003;Park et al, 2005), unit commitment (Ting et al, 2006), congestion management in power system (Hazra and Sinha, 2007), beamforming in the presence of mutual coupling (Demarcke et al, 2009), etc. These extensive uses of PSO owe to its merits of no dependence on convexity assumptions, requirement on very little computational time, its simplicity, superior convergence characteristics and high solution quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimal value for W is determined by using a particle swarm optimization algorithm, [26], which maximizes the energy contained in the first 20 orders of the Slepian expansion. The algorithm performed 3000 iterations, after which a value of W = 0.1254 was obtained.…”
Section: Slepian Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of the positions of array elements is very important for producing a radiation pattern that is as similar as possible to the radiation pattern required to be produced via the relevant antenna array [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Many researchers studying in the field of electromagnetic optimization problems have conducted many studies on the subject of non-uniformly spaced linear antenna arrays [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary algorithms have been commonly used for optimizing Side Lobe Level (SLL) [24][25][26] values of antenna arrays, and ensuring an optimized null control from the designed arrays. Many studies were carried out in order to develop antenna arrays having different geometric characteristics [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Circular shaped antenna arrays [7,9,11,12] are intensively used in applications such as sonars, radars, mobile and commercial satellite communication systems [27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%