2018
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2018.2821635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beam Design and User Scheduling for Nonorthogonal Multiple Access With Multiple Antennas Based on Pareto Optimality

Abstract: In this paper, an efficient transmit beam design and user scheduling method is proposed for multi-user (MU) multiple-input single-output (MISO) non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) downlink, based on Pareto-optimality. The proposed beam design and user scheduling method groups simultaneously-served users into multiple clusters with practical two users in each cluster, and then applies spatical zeroforcing (ZF) across clusters to control inter-cluster interference (ICI) and Pareto-optimal beam design with succ… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 7, it can be seen that the throughput performance of both full and partial CSI of our proposed schemes achieve better performance compared to the full CSI performance of Pareto-optimality scheme [15]. In addition, it can be noticed that in high SNR TABLE 1.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Fig. 7, it can be seen that the throughput performance of both full and partial CSI of our proposed schemes achieve better performance compared to the full CSI performance of Pareto-optimality scheme [15]. In addition, it can be noticed that in high SNR TABLE 1.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In [15], beam design and-user-scheduling based on the Pareto-optimality algorithm was proposed to control the rates of strong and weak users in downlink multiuser NOMA. However, the performance of SUS-SIR algorithm in [12] still gives a higher throughput for the total system and weak users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximization problem for given (R * 1 , · · · , R * L−1 ) can be solved by a convex programming approach based on reformulation [18] and the convex concave procedure (CCP) [19]. However, difficulty lies in knowing the feasible target rate-tuple set for the MISO BC with superposition coding and SIC since the rates depend on the beam vectors and channel vectors of all in-group users, although some induction approach for this was proposed in [20]. The difficulty to find the feasible rate tuple for Users 1, · · · , L−1 can be circumvented by formulating the problem as weighted sum rate maximization based on the rateprofile approach [21].…”
Section: A Intra-group Beam Design and The Corresponding Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the N = K = 4 system, we considered 10 log 10 Pt 1 = [10,15,20,40,60] dB, where one in the denominator is the noise variance. For each SNR point, we generated 500,000 channel realizations.…”
Section: Rate Distribution and Multiplexing Gain Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not feasible to restructure the entire network each time it gets clogged up with traffic, therefore, a more realistic approach is to adopt as a reconfigurable solution [45]. Moreover, the data demand for user plane (UP) and control plane (CP) in the 5G network will likely grow at different speeds, resulting in an independently scalable solution and user's demands will increase alongside user's intolerance to underperforming applications [46]. For optimal performance, 5G networks will adopt a more coordinated approach to radio access network (RAN) technology based on CoMP transmission and Inter-cell Interference Coordination (ICIC) as already demonstrated in the recent release-15 systems [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%